Who Are Some Great Text Gamers To Model?

Mist22 said:

Spoiler: A Little Context

Intro

Hello I’m Mist. A newbie in the art of seduction.

Last week I did a lot of texting to get a feel for where I am at, what’s limiting me from making my phone a pussy magnet, and experiment with other approaches of text minus sexting and long texting.

My expressed aim was to put myself in texting scenarios I run into a lot and newer ones and ultimately get some sort of action off of my phone by Thursday, Friday, and or Saturday.

I achieved one, but no action from any leads I was texting.

Met a couple more women. Still no action via the phone.

I’ll eventually compile abunch of what occurred last week and try to melt them down into common scenarios and ask you guys how you have approached these scenarios with specific sets.

I’m satisfied with meeting more women, but I also know there isn’t much point in learning seduction if I’m not upping my odds with women I desire and learning to navigate different interest levels.

Plus it would be nice to eventually be able to leave the house with confidence that I can not only meet a girl, but that my probability of bedding her can be influenced positively.

Currently I just know I can meet tons of women and some of them like me, some don’t, some indifferent.

Still working on the fucking part haha.

Anyway intro over.

Thank you for your attention.

TL;DR
Basically What I did, What I’m doing, Why my question.

I don’t particularly care what texting style they take as long as you have found it effective for you.

You’re not limited to any medium. Can be a forum post, video, or a goddamn excel spreadsheet.

Shoot

Peace

Click to expand...

Minimalists - There are guys out there that say "strictly logistics". These dudes are idiots. Just because you got her contact information in a good situation, doesn't mean she's DYING TO GO OUT WITH YOU. Often times a man has to respark that initial energy, and blow that spark into a fire. By going to strictly logistics, he doesn't make any text snafus, but he more often than not makes a warm lead go cold. Logistics only is appropriate only for guys that have fat pipelines of girls coming in AND already good text game.

The sexy texters. In my opinion, rookies always want to sexualize something, but don't have the female understanding or social dynamics knowledge to do so properly. Trying to get the girl wet, trying to get her to send pics, maybe works in the moment, but it often induces ASD, often makes the guy look thirsty, or worse yet - the ramp up and release kills her desire for the real thing. Let's not even get into your texts being circulated in her friend group. (and to the press!)

The veteran can get away with sexuality dripping from his every pore. Sexy in silence, sexy on instagram, sexy when he speaks, sexy in text. But the rookie is not calibrated well enough to do it.

At best, he'll screen out prudes (which is most women when they don't know the guy) and screen in the girls with the highest possible buying temperature. And he still has to have the logistics set up PERFECTLY to close her.

The seducer's ideal - Very few texts, very few words, personalized, plausibly deniable, evergreen but maximum emotional impact.

When couples spend a lot of time together, they have a shared history. A lot can be conveyed from one person to another with "a look". Only they know what they're saying to each other and what things mean.

That's what a player should strive for with his texts.

Every text he sends should aim for that ideal, their own secret language, their own special code.

Which means you must be a conversationalist.

Most rookies don't have the pipeline or overall seductive appeal to barely say anything.
Most rookies have not calibrated their sexual persona.
And most rookies don't write well enough or know how to create that shared history with a girl to "mix/max" their effect on women via text.

All that is left is learning how to express yourself via text, and proactively taking steps to do so.

The conversationalist knows how to handle a

"WYD" received at 7:37 am (which is a text I got today)

Click to expand...

ferrero said:

Skills. @Skills

Let me clarify:

- Basic texting guide
- Getting phone numbers and ice-breakers
- How and when to soft close
- Radio silence/flakiness
- On morning texts/pings
- Baiting her to hint a meet
- Momentum in texting

Here's an example (kinda long)

- From text to sex, best sexting ever (on skills' blog)

Also, a worthy mention from Velasco

- Compilation of texting posts that formed texting philosophy

Click to expand...

​

Skills said:

NO texting works. unless very strong interactions, a lot of guys are missing the STRONG INTERACTION,

Click to expand...

Skills said:

P.s. i am talking cold approach, if a girl gives you number online different story...

Click to expand...

POB said:

Precisely!

Online you can consider your pictures the "strong interaction".
Get pro looking pics ASAP.

Click to expand...