- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Messages
- 717
What's up fellas.
Two recent situations have led me to a "Eureka" moment and I wanted to get this down before I forget it.
We've all read Chase's brilliant distillation of how sales principles can be successfully applied to seduction.
In this quick post, I want to go over how building positive compliance (a sort of "yes ladder" but where her "yes" is her texting you back) increases the chances that you are able to schedule a date with a chick you number closed, thusly getting you closer to whetting your willy inside her coopapy.
Recently I executed a seduction of a hot 23-year-old girl on autopilot (she was the kind who doesn't exhibit her goods on the sidewalk but hides them below her modest attire, albeit with a "powerful woman" image) and even more recently I messed up next-day texts with another babe, who had basically said she was up for drinks (but who I also made the mistake of giving a peck on the lips to say goodbye from the house party I threw for NYE in which I made the additional mistakes of making out with two other chicks and sexy dancing with a third).
But regarding the texting with both, here is what I think I did well with the first and not so well with the second:
1. When I texted the first, I picked up a thread we had left open during our in-person convo, firmly in the social arena, in order to get her to respond, in so doing building positive compliance from her. I started by texting her the two recommendations I had given her in person. There is no risk for her to respond, the compliance request is very low, so it would be natural for her to respond.
Then she was the one to pick up the thread of "we should meet again one day" which I then agreed with and made more tangible by saying "a drink", and honing in on scheduling the week after.
2. When I texted the second, I went straight to asking her if she would be up for getting a drink the following evening. How does she read this? First of all, she was hungover from NYE and probably feeling under the weather. Second of all, it makes her think you're horny to smash her, effectively emptying your deck. Third of all, by forcing her into a corner she is more likely to reject (especially since you didn't give her the illusion of choice by suggesting two alternative days), and fourth of all, the compliance loop you are asking her to jump over is too big right from the start.
Now, when she rejects your offer, you have started to build negative compliance, which makes closing the sale much harder going forward, as it's like building a "no ladder." If she says something like "I already have plans tomorrow, how about next week?" she's basically getting rid of you.
Hit it with comments and questions.
~Bizz
Two recent situations have led me to a "Eureka" moment and I wanted to get this down before I forget it.
We've all read Chase's brilliant distillation of how sales principles can be successfully applied to seduction.
In this quick post, I want to go over how building positive compliance (a sort of "yes ladder" but where her "yes" is her texting you back) increases the chances that you are able to schedule a date with a chick you number closed, thusly getting you closer to whetting your willy inside her coopapy.
Recently I executed a seduction of a hot 23-year-old girl on autopilot (she was the kind who doesn't exhibit her goods on the sidewalk but hides them below her modest attire, albeit with a "powerful woman" image) and even more recently I messed up next-day texts with another babe, who had basically said she was up for drinks (but who I also made the mistake of giving a peck on the lips to say goodbye from the house party I threw for NYE in which I made the additional mistakes of making out with two other chicks and sexy dancing with a third).
But regarding the texting with both, here is what I think I did well with the first and not so well with the second:
1. When I texted the first, I picked up a thread we had left open during our in-person convo, firmly in the social arena, in order to get her to respond, in so doing building positive compliance from her. I started by texting her the two recommendations I had given her in person. There is no risk for her to respond, the compliance request is very low, so it would be natural for her to respond.
Then she was the one to pick up the thread of "we should meet again one day" which I then agreed with and made more tangible by saying "a drink", and honing in on scheduling the week after.
2. When I texted the second, I went straight to asking her if she would be up for getting a drink the following evening. How does she read this? First of all, she was hungover from NYE and probably feeling under the weather. Second of all, it makes her think you're horny to smash her, effectively emptying your deck. Third of all, by forcing her into a corner she is more likely to reject (especially since you didn't give her the illusion of choice by suggesting two alternative days), and fourth of all, the compliance loop you are asking her to jump over is too big right from the start.
Now, when she rejects your offer, you have started to build negative compliance, which makes closing the sale much harder going forward, as it's like building a "no ladder." If she says something like "I already have plans tomorrow, how about next week?" she's basically getting rid of you.
Hit it with comments and questions.
~Bizz