Game defined

[Rakehell]

I’ve surmised after years of study that game can be simplified into a singular definition.

The ability as a man to make a receptive woman submit to your will, regardless of if it collides with her own.

Whether you do this with subtlety, smooth talking, aloofness or not is completely up to your personality and personal method of persuasion.

This does not mean forcing yourself upon her.

Its simply persuasion and women are highly susceptible to being persuaded. If you instinctually know this and garner your own method of convincing women then you will be on the right path to figuring out a winning strategy. There’s 100 ways to skin a chicken so find what you can utilize to your skillset the best.

Imagine a woman frozen in ice and your job is to get her out. You have a million tools to carve out her shape and it is up to you to do so without breaking her. Her body is highly fragile in this state and she longs to be free. You have a set amount of time before she is gone forever. You must work to carve her out without breaking her or allowing her to perish within the ice.

Game is how you get her out the ice alive. Whatever your intentions with girls it all boils down to making her agree to your end goal.
You calibrate your methods to how thick or dense the ice and how little the time.

This website is like an armory. It’d be a waste of precious time to use every tool here to carve one piece of ice. You must choose your tools according to the project and your knowledge of the tool.

Find what the ice is receptive to and axe away adroitly but gracefully.

 

[ocean_eyes]

I totally agree with your definition.

However, the fact that you have to write this caveat:
"This does not mean forcing yourself upon her."

After writing this:
"The ability as a man to make a receptive woman submit to your will, regardless of if it collides with her own."

Makes me think that we can re-word that definition a little better, to avoid having to "explain."

personally, when it comes to everything done in the pursuit of pick-up, I like to frame it in the MOST socially-acceptable way (and focus on the benefits for women). That way there's no cognitive dissonance between her (or the group), and myself.

Someone once wrote "Sex is something that her & I are BOTH working towards. The goal is to remove all the obstacles in OUR way"
That was a brilliant revelation for me.

It facilitates "Us vs. the World" rather than "Me vs. Her" mentality.

 

[Rakehell]

I totally agree with your definition.

However, the fact that you have to write this caveat:
"This does not mean forcing yourself upon her."

After writing this:
"The ability as a man to make a receptive woman submit to your will, regardless of if it collides with her own."

Makes me think that we can re-word that definition a little better, to avoid having to "explain."

personally, when it comes to everything done in the pursuit of pick-up, I like to frame it in the MOST socially-acceptable way (and focus on the benefits for women). That way there's no cognitive dissonance between her (or the group), and myself.

Someone once wrote "Sex is something that her & I are BOTH working towards. The goal is to remove all the obstacles in OUR way"
That was a brilliant revelation for me.

It facilitates "Us vs. the World" rather than "Me vs. Her" mentality.

I’m glad my definition resonated with you. Don’t get me wrong though, it’s not that I believe my definition could be misinterpreted.

In this day in age of only fans, hyper sexualized social media, and instant access to porn. There are more and more desperate men becoming angry who clamor online looking for things to reinforce what they already may want to do.

The “caveat” is intended to deter any would be incels looking for a reason to do something sick.

I believe my definition is clear, but some people will interpret it in the way that suits them the most. Thats just how it is.

As for remaining socially acceptable, I find that pick up / seduction isn’t socially acceptable in itself although many people do it but won’t admit. So trying to frame techniques and mindsets as acceptable in conversation for someone who’d frown upon a raw definition seems pointless in my opinion.

 

[ocean_eyes]

I’m glad my definition resonated with you. Don’t get me wrong though, it’s not that I believe my definition could be misinterpreted.

In this day in age of only fans, hyper sexualized social media, and instant access to porn. There are more and more desperate men becoming angry who clamor online looking for things to reinforce what they already may want to do.

The “caveat” is intended to deter any would be incels looking for a reason to do something sick.

I believe my definition is clear, but some people will interpret it in the way that suits them the most. Thats just how it is.

As for remaining socially acceptable, I find that pick up / seduction isn’t socially acceptable in itself although many people do it but won’t admit. So trying to frame techniques and mindsets as acceptable in conversation for someone who’d frown upon a raw definition seems pointless in my opinion.

Right on. Good counterpoints.

When I think of it in certain terms, pick-up works soo much more effectively.

Like, sex is fun, sex is no big deal, women love sex, women are crazy horny and both myself and the girl have a win-win scenario here.

The whole "have a receptive woman submit to your will" just sounds weird to me, even in my head. Like, I don't want that. I would never define pick-up that way, even to myself. The sentences above are way more natural.

But this all might be personal preference anyway.

Cheers!

 

[Rakehell]

Right on. Good counterpoints.

When I think of it in certain terms, pick-up works soo much more effectively.

Like, sex is fun, sex is no big deal, women love sex, women are crazy horny and both myself and the girl have a win-win scenario here.

The whole "have a receptive woman submit to your will" just sounds weird to me, even in my head. Like, I don't want that. I would never define pick-up that way, even to myself. The sentences above are way more natural.

But this all might be personal preference anyway.

Cheers!

Think of it this way. Women present you with several paths during an interaction. Depending on how you lead the interaction forward is what path you take. She constantly sets down traps in hopes that she catches you before you reach your end goal. Its not that its women vs man or men vs woman. It’s that we are always at the advantage so women must lay down these traps so that she does not allow an unworthy man to reach the final destination.

Women techincally do not work toward sex. This is because it is already an option when you first meet. Its just you as a man have to progress the interaction forward in a way that leads you to your desired end goal.

Your will is ultimately her will because women do not want the responsibility of leadership. If you cannot decisively lead yourself down the path that you choose, she will not allow herself to be apart of it.

It’s not a team sport, its more like a voyage. And you’re the captain leading your crew into prosperity or ruin. If she senses you are not capable or do not possess the abilities of a true captain she will jump ship and join another more capable captains voyage.