Nisha,
I'd say the easiest way to describe this is that the SMV allocation differs between men and women.
As an example, for men, SMV can be allocated as follows:
- 20% - Looks
- 20% - Game
- 20% - Status
- 20% - Wealth
- 20% - Attainability
As an example, for women, SMV can be allocated as follows:
(NOTE: These numbers are just an example and they do not reflect any actual metrics.)
This is just the reality of the situation for men and women when it comes to sexual market value. Men want beautiful women, and women want access to men with lots of value spread across multiple avenues.
There's of course lots of exceptions made all the time, but as a woman, it would absolutely be highly beneficial to focus
strongly on your looks first and foremost, and then working on your other qualities (personality, career, status, etc.) afterward. You'll also find that really good-looking women have more access to career and status-increasing options as a result of their looks, so being a physically attractive woman goes a MUCH longer way toward getting what you want while being a physically attractive man only plays a small role in achieving a better life.
Cheers,
Franco