What's new

How to Counteract the DLV in Cold Approach

Chase

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,170
@DarkKnight asked (in response to me talking about a client who refused to cold approach because he did not want to ever come in “lower value”):

Chase you wrote sometimes that approaching girls indeed brings a slight DLV, and you mentioned that a good seducer knows ways to counteracts this but you didn't extrapolate about it there, so I am curious what are your go to methods, are we talking about qualifying and chase frames?

Guys may not want to hear it, but it is true, generally. When you are the one who is opening, you take a bit of a value hit (DLV = Display of Lower Value).

When two guys wingman each other, the guy who does NOT open a particular set of girls generally seems higher value to the girls in it (all other things being equal). That's because he is the one who is just chilling, just hanging back, and ends up pulled into a conversation with the girls anyway. Classic Law of Least Effort: maximal results for minimal effort.

Another aspect of the "cold approach DLV" is that the higher effort the open, the greater the DLV risk. Cases in point:

  • You're seated on an airplane and you strike up a conversation with the man next to you. He feels higher value, at least initially. You are more worried about his reaction.

  • You're seated on an airplane, but this time the man next to you is the one who strikes up the conversation. He feels lower value than he would had you been the one to open. You are probably more worried about how you are going to get away if this guy turns out to not be able to take a hint.

  • You're walking down the street when a random man runs up to stop you wanting to ask you something. He feels even lower value than the airplane guy -- here he is chasing you down to try to get your attention.

A lot of guys won't cold approach at all because they sense the inherent DLV in it and their pride won't let them approach.

Much of approach anxiety might actually be distilled down to "I'm afraid of DLVing myself" even more than it is "I'm afraid of rejection."

Guys searching around trying to find the perfect opener are really trying to figure out a way to approach a girl that does not risk them looking lower value. They don't want to be the chaser, a guy who is begging for women/attention, etc.

(maybe this is also why some autism spectrum guys who get into cold approach become such relentless approach machines -- they just have no sense of "I am DLVing myself making these approaches" and so don't experience approach anxiety; downside is they also often don't learn to compensate for the DLV so end up struggling to get much out of their approaching)

Now, there are ways you can structure your openers so that you reduce the DLV by including DHVs in the actual opener. Skilled seducers are generally packing a bunch of DHV signals into their opens so they take as little a value hit as possible on opening. See this article for some examples of this:


Really, anything where you are being forceful and sincere or else playful and having fun in the opener does a great job of minimizing the DLV of being "the guy who is starting the conversation, rather than the one who is being pulled into the conversation or having it started with him by the other party."

Others are getting people to introduce you, making your openers as casual as possible (to reduce the effort you put in, and hence the DLV), and so forth.

However, we also have a bunch of ways to compensate for the DLV of effortful opening, too.


NONVERBAL SIGNS OF "BEING DISTRACTED"

One of the ways we can even out the odds is by using nonverbal signals that a girl is slightly "losing us" early on into the approach.

You need to start out friendly and energetic to pull her into social mode and disarm her reservations.

But once you're a few seconds in, you can start using nonverbal cues that you maybe are about to exit.

One of these is "body rocking", where you are leaning back and away a bit, on your back foot, then back in, then back out a bit again.

Another is where you turn your head away from her somewhat while still keeping your eyes on her.

Anything where you are REDUCING physical attention to her, without making it so overt that you are committing yourself to actually exiting the conversation, signals that "subconsciously" you are thinking about leaving.

If a girl's not into you these signals won't have any effect.

However, if she's excited by your approach and wants you to stay, you will typically notice nonverbal chasing behavior on her part in response to your nonverbal withdrawal. e.g., she will turn her body more fully toward you, uncross her arms, straighten her posture up more / project her breasts, lean her head in more, etc.

Other ways of doing this are looking a bit distracted, seeming to check out someone else behind her (e.g., another girl), etc.

You don't want to overdo this; you just want to do it enough that she thinks to herself, "Hey! Why am I losing him!" and puts a little effort in to get you re-focused on her.

Then you are in the game.


TEASING

Another anti-DLV tech is teasing.

When you tease a girl, you are saying "I am comfortable enough with you that I'm not afraid of what your reaction will be when I tease you."

Girls who are receptive to your teases of them are accepting a frame where it is okay for you to tease them.

They will not generally accept a tease from a guy they view as lower value than them. So just by getting her to accept a tease from you, you are getting her to say, "Okay, this guy is not actually lower value, in fact."

I have a guide on teasing on Girls Chase here:


There are more advanced forms of tease -- for less receptive girls -- such as negs:


I have another kind of tease I call the "rug pull" tease, which functions similar to a neg. I have that one in Lush Teases (shameless plug -- you will just have to wait for the course to come out if you want that one ;) ).

But unless you are approaching girls with very high walls (like hot girls already drowning in attention in nightclubs) or you are trying to crack closed off / impossible girls, normal teases are usually going to do just fine for you here.


CONTRIBUTION SPACE

Another way to re-take the dynamic is by leaving open space for a girl to contribute to the interaction.

Generally you need to be prepared to run the first two up to five minutes of conversation totally on your own. This is so you can handle girls who are not in social mode, girls who are very shy, girls who simply do not actively signal interest much/at all, etc.

However, a good practice to get into is to regularly leave "contribution space" open in your interactions so girls can jump in and contribute on their own.

You do that by bringing a conversation thread to a close but not opening another new one up yet, and seeing if she will ask you a question or offer anything of her own. For instance, you ask her what she does for fun, she answers, you ask her how long she's been at it, she answers, and then you tell her it's an awesome hobby. Then for a moment you don't say anything. Does she jump in to try to keep the conversation going? To ask you about your own hobbies? To start expounding on her hobby?

If so, does she seem like she's doing it out of politeness or does she seem like she is genuinely trying to keep the conversation rolling?

You don't want your contribution spaces to be that long -- maybe a two-second pause or so -- in the first few minutes, because otherwise some girls will feel too awkward and make their exit. But it is good to have these scattered in there as opportunities for girls to contribute.

Another way of adding contribution space is the pregnant pause... though these can be a bit too lengthy for the first few minutes of an interaction.

But the gist is the more she works to take over when you leave "contribution space" for her, and the more you get the feeling she is doing so because she LIKES you (and not because she just feels socially obligated to), the more you offset the initial DLV of cold approach and get back to even footing, or even higher footing, where she will start to chase you.


JEALOUSY PLOTLINES

The emergency button if nothing else works is jealousy plotlines.

If you open a girl but she doesn't respond to nonverbal distraction signs, shrugs off your teases, and doesn't fill contribution space herself, talk to her friend. Or talk to another girl nearby briefly.

A lot of the time that is all you need to return to the first girl only to find that now she is a lot readier to play ball.


WHAT ABOUT...

Screening & qualifying?

Disqualifiers?

Etc.?

These don't actually work to compensate for the approach DLV because so long as you are still in the initial "just approached DLV" phase, she does not believe these techs and views them as techs.

e.g., a guy stops you on the street as you are passing a furniture shop, strikes up a quick conversation, then disqualifies you by saying, "Anyway, you look like more of an IKEA type of guy." Yeah sure he's disqualified you, but you already know he opened you to get you to go into his furniture store, so it doesn't work as an anti-DLV.

However if he stops you, chats with you for a bit, and you're kind of checking out his store, and then he body rocks away from you, starts looking a bit distracted, tells you, "Anyway..." as he appears to be looking off toward someone else walking down the street, and you then ask him, "Anyway, what kind of furniture do you have in there?" He can then come coolly back in with "Different pieces. Some antiques, some designer stuff, some stuff for folks on a budget. A pretty wide gamut," and suddenly now you are the one chasing him, inquiring more about whether he has this or that, what his prices are, etc.


WHAT IF YOU DO ZERO ANTI-DLV STUFF?

If you have really strong fundamentals (great energy, great posture, solid fashion, etc.) it is possible to come in strong enough that a girl is looking at you thinking to herself, "Well he doesn't SEEM lower value!" and trying to figure out the mystery of a guy like you approaching a girl like her.

However, as you get better fundamentals and game you may notice it gets harder to approach less attractive girls until you start naturally doing things that add in some nonverbal signs of distraction, or light playful teases, or add in space for the girl to contribute. You make the cold approach, which is a DLV behavior, then don't give her any opportunities to chase you herself, all while seeming like you should actually be much HIGHER value than her, and she can't reconcile the incongruence and bails ("Something is wrong here. Is he tooling me?" she thinks).

It gets easier to approach increasingly hot girls without anti-DLV tech as your fundamentals and game improve. The DLV hit is less of a problem when everything else about you already screams high value. A middle value seeming guy doing cold approach maybe drops from a 6 to a 5, meanwhile a high value guy might drop from a 9 to an 8. High value guy is still looking good.

You don't have to explicitly anti-DLV. As she gets into the interaction with you, she will gradually settle into things, and all the other stuff you are doing will lead her to whatever impression of you girls normally end up with you thanks to your game + fundamentals.

Thus, anti-DLV tech is basically just for the first few minutes after the open: what are you doing to offset the value hit you get from cold approach?


WHY YOU SHOULDN'T WORRY ABOUT THE COLD APPROACH DLV HIT


Let me give you one other thing to chew on though.

Because I don't want guys with approach anxiety to read this and say, "There, see! I was right. Cold approach is lower value. Back into my shell I go!"

Yes, you take a value hit walking up to a stranger you don't know and striking up a conversation.

However... who cares?

Does it matter if Unknown Girl A thinks you are a 7 out of 10 because you did not approach, vs. a 6 out of 10 because you did?

You can't pick her up, get a date with her, or turn her into your girlfriend if you don't approach.

That "7 out of 10 non-approaching guy" is purely hypothetical. She is never going to end up in a random conversation with you where you did not approach. The 7/10 guy who doesn't approach doesn't even matter. Only the 6/10 guy who approaches does.

She will figure out you are actually a 10/10 guy, not a 6/10 guy or a 7/10 guy, once you are fucking her brains out, don't worry.

Also, a lot of the stuff I have earlier in this post you are going to figure out over time anyway once you are approaching.

Everybody hates feeling lower value. You are going to get that "she is skeptical about me, I have lowered my value by approaching" feeling when you approach plenty of girls, and you are going to turn your mind to figuring out how to not have that happen.

You will test things out and probably independently figure out that disqualifying her, screening then qualifying her, etc., doesn't compensate for the approach DLV, but nonverbal distraction signals, teases, and contribution space does (or, if nothing is working, the jealousy plotline).

Every guy I know who is good with girls does this stuff seemingly automatically. You just figure it out.

Also: the cold approach DLV hit is not very severe.

At most you are dropping a point maybe on the 1-to-10 attractiveness scale.

You will more than make up for that with your behavior with her after the approach.

If you do anti-DLV stuff soon into the approach and she bites you'll just make up for it all the faster.

Girls like guys who approach. It is bold. They respect it and it excites them. It also makes them much more open to finding out if the guy approaching them is actually higher value, and thus a lot more receptive to these anti-DLV baits than, for instance, you would be to a guy doing this stuff to you.

Chase
 

Tryst

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Apr 9, 2024
Messages
42
Great insights. Personally, I think it is possible to cold approach without taking any sort of value hit. If you look at my field report, Public House Preselection, I open two sets giving me approach invites. I certainly didn't feel as if I took any sort of value hit on either for opening. But that was because, internally, deep down, I did not perceive the approach as anything out of the ordinary, anything high effort at all. In fact it was zero effort for me, no more effort than it would take for me to say "hi" to my friend.

  • When I casually grabbed the first girl and pulled her to me, the frame was "I am cooler than you and making you come here because I can tell you like me." If I had pushed through the crowd to open her and then spoken in her ear, I would have taken a value hit. But it wasn't the approach itself that gave me the hit - it was the effort I exerted, which was not inherent to the approach. It was possible to approach without a value hit because there was the frame that I was obviously cooler than her, and my cocky opening made it clear that I don't really care, I don't want anything. I'm not trying.

  • When I approached the 2set, I was clearly having a great time and wanting for nothing in my life. I didn't indicate that I wanted the girls because my approach was totally indirect, so no sort of preselection value hit. There was no effort on my part, I'm just an obviously cool and high value guy socialising. If I hadn't been so obviously cool and high value, then the frame would have been that I am a guy who wants something, and that would have incurred a value hit. But it was possible to approach without a value hit, by going indirect.

Just as you write, you take the value hit when you're perceived to be making an effort: opening a 2set in the club, and you have to speak really loud, maybe even lean in, switch your gaze from girl to girl. It's really hard to come off zero effort here, and I do feel the value hit. But in a pub, no music, filled with chatter, open space between me and the set, I'm clearly having a great time already with hot girls, and in fact, I really am just leaving, and I just decide on the tiniest whim to open a set... zero effort.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that the effort you put in is purely imaginary. It's not real. It's a less-than-truth, completely determined by frame. And if my frame is that I am not putting any effort in, then they might agree with that frame, and then my value (which is also not real and completely determined by frame) does not drop at all. Am I making sense?

In the real world, I don't believe anyone who saw me open either set would have perceived even the tiniest drop in value from seeing me open. Even if their view is immediately cut off just as I first opened my mouth and they didn't see the girls' reactions, I don't believe that they would have perceived my totally casual and unplanned act of strolling up to some hot chicks as at all low value, because I am clearly in a chilled and social mood, not needing anything.

The conclusion this leads me to is important: it is not the cold approach itself which is low value, but the effort you put into it, which comes with the implication that your life at the exact moment you make the cold approach is lacking something, and the effort you put in is to rectify that lack.

- "Oh, this guy is approaching that hot girl. I guess he doesn't have any hot girls in his life right now."
- "Oh, this guy is approaching that group. I guess he's bored because he doesn't have his own friends to chill with."

This effort and accompanying feeling of lacking something is not inherent to the cold approach. If you can cold approach without this frame, then the cold approach does not incur any value hit.

You touch upon this right at the start with your mention of the Law of Least Effort (super important and valuable stuff. I say to all my friends... "Just don't try, or at least... don't be seen to be trying.)



Of course everything I've just said is pure theoretical mental masturbation with exactly ZERO real world application. Your post is excellent and filled with great real world applicable stuff. Whether or not the value hit actually exists or is incurred, you can totally make up for it within seconds.

It's often impossible/very difficult to get a "zero effort open" as I describe, and so your tech is super valuable.

- Tryst
 
Last edited:

Gaturro

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Oct 25, 2021
Messages
86
Great post! Is it a DLV in night game though? I understand what you mean, but from my experience, the guy who opens a set of girls and talks to one (especially when it's so loud) is the one who ends up establishing the most rapport with her. Even if the other guy is more chill, the one who started talking usually wins the interaction, especially for being bold and initiating the conversation so close to her. I guess you sum it up in the conclusion. Thanks for the post :)
 

DarkKnight

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Oct 18, 2018
Messages
1,750
is the one who ends up establishing the most rapport with her.
Agreed, he tends to be the most talkative and the leader by default..

Although not always. I have gone out with friends who are really talkative and I think veering a bit into tryhard and the girls end up uninterested or interested in me

I think it comes down to the vibe and fundamentals of you and your wing. Chase has this article about exciters and fascinators.. and the picture of what I saw of the exciter is really typical for what I try to describe

Fascinators can look but a lot of times can wallflower and be uneffective and this can kill their state

But someone with high fundamentals and high social momentum -> that guy is deadly becayse they also tend to be more energetic due to winner momentum and are not coping with being tryhard, which is the biggest mistake of the talkative guys
 

Marty

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
1,525
Skilled seducers are generally packing a bunch of DHV signals into their opens so they take as little a value hit as possible on opening. See this article for some examples of this:

This is an excellent article.

Evidently, I am coming across this way to all younger people except attractive women! 🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️ It’s because I perceive them differently.
 

Loverboy

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
May 9, 2024
Messages
33
Sorry to be late to the party but... Is cold approaching really a DLV??
I've brainwashed myself into believing that girls in today's day and age are desperate, craving for that one guy who has the balls to actually come say hi to them. Approaching them (if you do it correctly and if they are in a receptive state) is actually a massive compliment for them and a sign of masculine confidence.

This post is my bible on the topic.
rVbiFGF.jpeg
 
the right date makes getting her back home a piece of cake

Marty

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
1,525
Is cold approaching really a DLV??
I've brainwashed myself into believing that girls in today's day and age are desperate, craving for that one guy who has the balls to actually come say hi to them. Approaching them (if you do it correctly and if they are in a receptive state) is actually a massive compliment for them and a sign of masculine confidence.
I’ve certainly never noticed a drop in my own value on opening, although I don’t know how the other party perceived it. I’d always assumed that she was completely oblivious to me before I said hello, which would imply that my pre-approach value was unknown or zero.

What did however surprise me about the screenshot you posted is that Ms. Sheena Sharma is using the word ‘approach’. I didn’t know that ‘normies’ said that; I had certainly never used or probably even heard the word in that context before I joined this site in 2013, despite having 17 years’ dating history before that point. You just ‘met a girl’ or ‘took her out’, right?

It seems that some of the technical language has leaked into the public consciousness.
 

Skills

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
5,069
Sorry to be late to the party but... Is cold approaching really a DLV??

Nooo
I've brainwashed myself into believing that girls in today's day and age are desperate, craving for that one guy who has the balls to actually come say hi to them. Approaching them (if you do it correctly and if they are in a receptive state) is actually a massive compliment for them and a sign of masculine confidence.

This post is my bible on the topic.
rVbiFGF.jpeg
Good article
 

Skills

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
5,069
I’ve certainly never noticed a drop in my own value on opening, although I don’t know how the other party perceived it. I’d always assumed that she was completely oblivious to me before I said hello, which would imply that my pre-approach value was unknown or zero.

What did however surprise me about the screenshot you posted is that Ms. Sheena Sharma is using the word ‘approach’. I didn’t know that ‘normies’ said that; I had certainly never used or probably even heard the word in that context before I joined this site in 2013, despite having 17 years’ dating history before that point. You just ‘met a girl’ or ‘took her out’, right?

It seems that some of the technical language has leaked into the public consciousness.
Brah!
 

ChrisXKiss

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jul 31, 2023
Messages
393
This is a great topic. And I've also felt that after a number of approaches you naturally start thinking of ways to calibrate.

I wonder if we could say that approaching increases your attainability, since it makes you available to the girl, and if your whole fundamentals are projecting just enough high value for her, you are at the perfectly sweet spot. But this only works straight away for a tight margin of girls.

If you are too high value, approaching itself will not be enough to make you attainable, because she will even question why you are going for her. So being relaxed, and letting her contribute shows that you are indeed the high value guy she thought, and at the same time she feels you are increasingly attainable, since you keep staying there investing time in her.

And if she feels you are too low value, approaching even in a highly authoritative way will not be enough to make her initially care that you made yourself attainable to her. However it can pick her interest, and if you keep being chill, pass any tests, use some anti-DLV techniques and not chase, she may start thinking that she has misjudged you, and that you are higher value in fact, and also maybe not even that attainable in the end.

So in the previous scenario the anti-DLVs assured the girl that you have high value and attainability, and in the later they made her realise that you have high value and are not as attainable as she would have thought.
 

Chase

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,170
Hey fellas,

First off, I don't want to belabor this point too much. From a purely psychological perspective, "I am lowering my value by approaching" is not a helpful mindset.

From a totally objective perspective, approaches are generally going to be somewhat/slight DLVs unless you are doing them extremely authoritatively or in some way that comes across as blaming the girl for the approach.

Compare:

  • Random guy runs up to you on the street: "Hey, how you doing?"
  • Random guy turns to you at the bar: "So how's it going buddy?"
  • Sales guy approaches you in a store: "Anything I can help you with?"

At the back of your head your first thought with all these people is going to generally tend to be, "What's this guy want and how much is it going to cost me?" Now compare him to:

  • Cool guy on the street who gives you a nod but does not approach
  • Cool guy at the bar who gives you a smile & wink but doesn't bother talking to you
  • Cool sales guy in the store who you see dealing with other customers and notices you, gives you a thumbs up, then goes back to dealing with the other customers
Each of these guys not approaching seems higher value than the guy approaching you.

Of course if you forego approaching to "look cool" then you will look cool but you will get far fewer approaches in, and be a lot less successful than the guy who approaches!

That's why I do not want to belabor this too much... I don't want to put guys in their heads or psyche them out.

Just give them strategies to OFFSET the DLV you get from approaching.

Here is the exception that proves the rule: dude with authority approaches you:

  • Bouncer stops you at the entrance of a nightclub: "Hey, wait here for a second, okay?"
  • Policeman stops you on the street: "Hi, mind if I talk to you for a second?"
  • Lifeguard approaches you at the beach: "Waves are a little rough today. You planning on going for a swim?"

Right away you assume this individual is stopping you for some reason and you had better obey it. In this case, it's a DHV open rather than a DLV; this person is not asking you for something or hoping to get something from you, but telling you to do something (and you are hoping to get something yourself: entrance to the club, permission to swim, or maybe just not to go to jail!).

The "excuuuse meeee" you can use during street game where you adopt the voice tone as if a woman just lost her purse and you are trying to return it, or the opener where you behave (nonverbally and verbally) as if you know her are also generally going to offset the approach DLV by default. She either thinks you are about to tell her something important or that the two of you are already acquainted and she's the one in the wrong for forgetting you.

Obviously, the more you come across authoritative in your opens, the less of a DLV they are generally going to carry.

If you can come across authoritative enough, AND appear to have a legitimate reason for opening the girl (especially one where she is hoping to get something from you or permission from you), you can actually construct DHV opens.


@Tryst,

In the real world, I don't believe anyone who saw me open either set would have perceived even the tiniest drop in value from seeing me open. Even if their view is immediately cut off just as I first opened my mouth and they didn't see the girls' reactions, I don't believe that they would have perceived my totally casual and unplanned act of strolling up to some hot chicks as at all low value, because I am clearly in a chilled and social mood, not needing anything.

Keep in mind, we are not too worried about third party observers. They are mostly judging value by the outcome. e.g., you walk up to a hot girl and suddenly she's behaving very flirtatious, your value is up. You walk up to a hot girl and she abruptly rejects you, your value is down.

The DLV we're concerned with is the interpersonal dynamic on the approach. Who's approaching who and for what?

If you're chilling at the bar and I suddenly approach you, we both know that a.) I want something from you and b.) you may or may not want something from me, but at least didn't want it enough to approach me yourself.

So we want ways to counteract that to get you investing more so that you feel like you're pursuing me and wanting something more from me than I want from you.


@Gaturro,

Great post! Is it a DLV in night game though? I understand what you mean, but from my experience, the guy who opens a set of girls and talks to one (especially when it's so loud) is the one who ends up establishing the most rapport with her. Even if the other guy is more chill, the one who started talking usually wins the interaction, especially for being bold and initiating the conversation so close to her. I guess you sum it up in the conclusion. Thanks for the post :)

Yeah, it is.

A lot of the time the guy opening makes himself more attainable via opening. Sure, he's a bit lower value, but he's also very clearly showed the girls he is interested in meeting them. The other guy who's just chilling seems higher value but also less open. Girls behave more cautious around him, because he may or may not be interested in them. The guy who opens clearly is.

The opening wing and non-opening wing have different priorities for this reason. The opening wing needs to build his value up a bit more and lower his attainability some, generally speaking; meanwhile the non-opening wing needs to be a lot more focused on raising his attainability (i.e., showing active interest, engaging with the girls, seeking to build connections, etc.).

Non-opening wing being more chill = higher value but much lower attainability. It can still go his way if the girls are confident, but girls will often tend to treat this guy as "guy who hasn't shown much of a/any sign of interest" and play it safe with him to avoid a rejection.


@Loverboy,

Sorry to be late to the party but... Is cold approaching really a DLV??
I've brainwashed myself into believing that girls in today's day and age are desperate, craving for that one guy who has the balls to actually come say hi to them. Approaching them (if you do it correctly and if they are in a receptive state) is actually a massive compliment for them and a sign of masculine confidence.

This post is my bible on the topic.
rVbiFGF.jpeg

Think of it this way:

  1. Woman's fantasy: "I wish a dashing man would approach me ❤️"
  2. Woman in real life: walking along, in her head, totally not thinking about / ready to be approached 😑😴
  3. Woman getting approached: random guy walks up to her, delivers opener: "Oh!" 😲 she thinks. "I wonder what this guy wants?" 🤔

Although women DO want to be approached, in the moment when a man first approaches them, he has suddenly intruded into their space -- a stranger -- and they can reasonably expect he wants something from them more than they want anything from him. This is the DLV.

If you're good, you'll have it largely offset within a few minutes. She hooks, starts to want something with you, you're sending her somewhat mixed signals about whether you ACTUALLY want it with her, and she starts to chase. DLV eliminated.

As for the guy's comments about approaching -- here is the complete perspective:

  • Men won't approach because they fear the initial DLV

  • Women won't approach themselves because they also fear the initial DLV

  • PUAs realize the initial DLV is unimportant in the grand scheme of things -- even if some girls go off thinking, "How cute, that guy really tried to take a shot with me, tee-hee!" you are still going to counteract the DLV with lots of girls, and end up going out with and banging a bunch of them, and all those girls are going to end up seeing you as higher value

This is another area where asymmetric returns apply. Most people are too afraid of the approach DLV and how it'll make them look in the other person's eyes and feel to themselves that they will not approach in the first place.


@ChrisXKiss,

This is a great topic. And I've also felt that after a number of approaches you naturally start thinking of ways to calibrate.

I wonder if we could say that approaching increases your attainability, since it makes you available to the girl, and if your whole fundamentals are projecting just enough high value for her, you are at the perfectly sweet spot. But this only works straight away for a tight margin of girls.

If you are too high value, approaching itself will not be enough to make you attainable, because she will even question why you are going for her. So being relaxed, and letting her contribute shows that you are indeed the high value guy she thought, and at the same time she feels you are increasingly attainable, since you keep staying there investing time in her.

And if she feels you are too low value, approaching even in a highly authoritative way will not be enough to make her initially care that you made yourself attainable to her. However it can pick her interest, and if you keep being chill, pass any tests, use some anti-DLV techniques and not chase, she may start thinking that she has misjudged you, and that you are higher value in fact, and also maybe not even that attainable in the end.

So in the previous scenario the anti-DLVs assured the girl that you have high value and attainability, and in the later they made her realise that you have high value and are not as attainable as she would have thought.

Excellent analysis. Totally spot on!

Chase
 

donjuan77

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Aug 4, 2024
Messages
28
I don't know I think you're reading too much into it. It probably also depends on the person. Someone chatting you up isn't going to DLV themselves if they do it in a cool way. If you think they're high value to begin with then you'll probably feel special they're talking to you. You'll be like what they're doing talking to little old me. Well guess what? Women think like this too. In fact, they wonder why you're talking to them instead of another girl. In other words: why is SHE the lucky one? Women generally put men on a pedestal unless you prove them wrong and most guys, myself included, almost always find a way to kill any status our forefathers have left us. Men have been portrayed as Gods, rulers, heros, legends, warriors, you name it, etc etc throughout history. It's engrained in a woman's mind that it's a man's world so trust me you already have status in her eyes before you open your mouth by virtue of having a dick. Its we who shoot ourselves in the foot constantly by assuming women are better than us and we have no value relative to her. Talk like its your world and she'll understand bc she's been programmed to understand. She's been programmed by men and she's been programmed by God by virtue of having a snatch. Likewise, act in any other way and she'll think you're weird bc it's weird to women when we don't act like the imagine of a man she has imprinted in her head and genes. Just my theory :)
 
Last edited:

ajacksb

Rookie
Rookie
Joined
Aug 11, 2024
Messages
6
Good post. "A lot of guys won't cold approach at all because they sense the inherent DLV in it and their pride won't let them approach. " I'm guilty of this. It's important to reframe things in your mind, however. If you set a goal of talking to 5 girls at a bar, then the metric for success is how many girls you approach. Not their reactions. The girl's reaction doesn't matter at all. The fact that you talked to her is the only thing that matters.

Then, in your own mind, the DLV doesn't exist because you're achieving your goal. And other people can sense this.
 
Top