- Joined
- Jan 2, 2015
- Messages
- 1,107
There are some schools of thought in seduction which suggest that any time we go on a failed date or do an otherwise prolonged interaction (i.e. we don't get rejected from the outset), it's our fault. We made some sort of mistake which is why the women rejected us. This school of thought also advocates that it is never the women's fault because it's not useful to think of it as such. It's a form of victim mentality.
Conversely, there are other schools of thought which suggest that any type of rejection isn't really rejection at all. Rather, its incompatibility. That is to say, at this point in time, this particular girl is not compatible with you. You're not a match. It's no one's fault persay. And the bottom line is, this "rejection" was actually a good thing. Because you've screened out a girl who's not right for you.
Personally, I don't think either school of thought is exactly correct. The first one is a recipe for self-doubt and self-esteem issues. Suggesting that it's possible to make any one date go completely well and that it's entirely in our control is Ludacris. There are some people who simply cannot relate to one another. It's just a fact. Regardless of how good their conversation skills are, their experience of the world is just too different for them to find enough common ground for them to form a relationship of any type.
The second school of thought on the other hand, is even worse. It's just another way of saying "just be yourself, and fuck anyone who doesn't like you". It's just not true. Cause guess what, if you have shit fundamentals, are supplicatory the entire date, have no interesting conversation, don't lead the interaction forward, and project a shit energy...the girl's not gonna like you. Sure you can call that "incompatibility" and just move on if you want to. But if you do, "incompatibility" will be the result more often than not.
So the discussion I would like to put forth is thus: When do you guys take responsibility for a failed interaction? Obviously, there are cases when it's clearly your fault. But let's say it's questionable (e.g. a date where try as you might, you find no topics on which you can relate to the girl you're with). Would you guys say that at that point, it's ok to call it "incompatibility"? Or do you take responsibility for the failed interactions no matter what?
Conversely, there are other schools of thought which suggest that any type of rejection isn't really rejection at all. Rather, its incompatibility. That is to say, at this point in time, this particular girl is not compatible with you. You're not a match. It's no one's fault persay. And the bottom line is, this "rejection" was actually a good thing. Because you've screened out a girl who's not right for you.
Personally, I don't think either school of thought is exactly correct. The first one is a recipe for self-doubt and self-esteem issues. Suggesting that it's possible to make any one date go completely well and that it's entirely in our control is Ludacris. There are some people who simply cannot relate to one another. It's just a fact. Regardless of how good their conversation skills are, their experience of the world is just too different for them to find enough common ground for them to form a relationship of any type.
The second school of thought on the other hand, is even worse. It's just another way of saying "just be yourself, and fuck anyone who doesn't like you". It's just not true. Cause guess what, if you have shit fundamentals, are supplicatory the entire date, have no interesting conversation, don't lead the interaction forward, and project a shit energy...the girl's not gonna like you. Sure you can call that "incompatibility" and just move on if you want to. But if you do, "incompatibility" will be the result more often than not.
So the discussion I would like to put forth is thus: When do you guys take responsibility for a failed interaction? Obviously, there are cases when it's clearly your fault. But let's say it's questionable (e.g. a date where try as you might, you find no topics on which you can relate to the girl you're with). Would you guys say that at that point, it's ok to call it "incompatibility"? Or do you take responsibility for the failed interactions no matter what?