I'm not sure whether to put this in the "Lifestyle" board, or the "Relationships" one, but I think it fits slightly better here.
Essentially, I have come to a strange dilemma in my life, which I cannot find any guidance on or, really even reference to, online or in my social network.
I found this site about 10 years ago. I am also no stranger to the "red pill" or "manosphere" dogmas, though I tend not to agree with most of them. However, I have had two unquestionable LTR deal breakers since I was a teenager, before I found any of this stuff:
1. Don't date (tobacco) smokers
2. Don't date (single) mothers
Now, in a period of my life where having children is my number one priority when it comes to women and dating, I find myself in a strange position.
I am dating, and have a real possibility of marrying, a single mother of one child. (No, she doesn't smoke, thankfully!) What's more, is that she is almost five years older than me. Now, ordinarily, either of these facts would make her a non-option to me, as a man who is realistically targeting in the 5 year younger (and childless) range. But, there's a catch.
She is better off than me. MUCH better off. So much better off, that I can't help but consider what having a kid with her would do for my child's possibilities.
For context, both of her parents have Harvard graduate degrees. She herself has a PhD from an Ivy League school and currently works in a very prestigious position for her age in the capital. Her child is boarding in private high school, and she's certainly not looking for me to provide financial support or help raise him/her.
My thoughts are basically this: If I married this woman, it would be not be for my relationship with her. She will undoubtedly "wear the pants" in the relationship. I don't expect us to have much of a sex life, if at all, given the reverse power disparity, but I would be going into it with open eyes. Knowing her and her sex drive, we would probably wind up in an open relationship after a few years, possibly after she cheats on me. But she likes me, and she wants security and companionship right now. She also wants to have at least one more child while she still can.
I have had a pretty good run of short-term and casual fun so far, but I really want to be a dad now. From what I hear, marriage tends to be pretty boring/sexless anyway, but I want my kids to grow up with two parents. Am I crazy to be considering settling down with this woman? I know it goes against everything we are traditionally taught, and my emotions are against it, but as a rational, objective thinker, it seems like the right move from a "reproductive success" standpoint.
What are your thoughts?
Edit:
I wanted to add, her genetic stock is top tier as well. Very high IQ, very high EQ, very high looks, attractiveness, and health, both for her age now and when she was younger.
Essentially, I have come to a strange dilemma in my life, which I cannot find any guidance on or, really even reference to, online or in my social network.
I found this site about 10 years ago. I am also no stranger to the "red pill" or "manosphere" dogmas, though I tend not to agree with most of them. However, I have had two unquestionable LTR deal breakers since I was a teenager, before I found any of this stuff:
1. Don't date (tobacco) smokers
2. Don't date (single) mothers
Now, in a period of my life where having children is my number one priority when it comes to women and dating, I find myself in a strange position.
I am dating, and have a real possibility of marrying, a single mother of one child. (No, she doesn't smoke, thankfully!) What's more, is that she is almost five years older than me. Now, ordinarily, either of these facts would make her a non-option to me, as a man who is realistically targeting in the 5 year younger (and childless) range. But, there's a catch.
She is better off than me. MUCH better off. So much better off, that I can't help but consider what having a kid with her would do for my child's possibilities.
For context, both of her parents have Harvard graduate degrees. She herself has a PhD from an Ivy League school and currently works in a very prestigious position for her age in the capital. Her child is boarding in private high school, and she's certainly not looking for me to provide financial support or help raise him/her.
My thoughts are basically this: If I married this woman, it would be not be for my relationship with her. She will undoubtedly "wear the pants" in the relationship. I don't expect us to have much of a sex life, if at all, given the reverse power disparity, but I would be going into it with open eyes. Knowing her and her sex drive, we would probably wind up in an open relationship after a few years, possibly after she cheats on me. But she likes me, and she wants security and companionship right now. She also wants to have at least one more child while she still can.
I have had a pretty good run of short-term and casual fun so far, but I really want to be a dad now. From what I hear, marriage tends to be pretty boring/sexless anyway, but I want my kids to grow up with two parents. Am I crazy to be considering settling down with this woman? I know it goes against everything we are traditionally taught, and my emotions are against it, but as a rational, objective thinker, it seems like the right move from a "reproductive success" standpoint.
What are your thoughts?
Edit:
I wanted to add, her genetic stock is top tier as well. Very high IQ, very high EQ, very high looks, attractiveness, and health, both for her age now and when she was younger.