- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
- Messages
- 6,551
Hi Guys,
There's a tendency of men to want to label women as mothers, 'they belong in the kitchen', 'you suppose to take care of the baby instead of me'. I find that i was actually getting sucked into the realm of the feminism and men who think women feel happier when they are at home (and there's research that there is).
Then i was thinking about a mental model that i posted here in the past. About consciousness, beliefs.
What if we are wrong? What if... we are taking women at surface level? What if we are too ingrained in what we believe in?
Here's why i am trying to break the mold here. Because this points break the mold for me.
1)Women are genuinely confused when friends ask what they want in a guy
2)Women don't feel 'biological urge' to be mothers
3)Women are consistent with work
I thought to myself. In life, principles always comes first. You can plant a tomato in cornfield and you can pray all you want with law of attraction. IT still not gonna work most of the time. What if we are looking at "beliefs" about women and it is a fundamental flaw? Just maybe, it is the principle?
Women are the "feeling" aspect of things. Men are the "object (end result)" aspect of things.
Give men.... porn and he completes the feeling aspect of him. Give men.... football(soccer) and he forgets about women. He doesn't need women. But reality, it hurts him if he wants to find a real women. So how does it plays for women?
Give women jobs ("object"), and she goes in a cycle.
Give women to park a car, she can't park it as well as men because of end result of parking the car. Her "object" is parking the car, there is no end result.
Given women sperm, and she breeds a baby. (Hilarious as this can be)
Give women inspiration, and she is inspirational
Women attracted to passion because it represents feelings. (which is them)
Women attracted to popular rock stars because it represents pillar, status and feelings/passion (which is them)
What if we were wrong all this while? Human history shows we are adaptable. Just maybe women replace men (object) with work?
Zac
There's a tendency of men to want to label women as mothers, 'they belong in the kitchen', 'you suppose to take care of the baby instead of me'. I find that i was actually getting sucked into the realm of the feminism and men who think women feel happier when they are at home (and there's research that there is).
Then i was thinking about a mental model that i posted here in the past. About consciousness, beliefs.
What if we are wrong? What if... we are taking women at surface level? What if we are too ingrained in what we believe in?
Here's why i am trying to break the mold here. Because this points break the mold for me.
1)Women are genuinely confused when friends ask what they want in a guy
2)Women don't feel 'biological urge' to be mothers
3)Women are consistent with work
I thought to myself. In life, principles always comes first. You can plant a tomato in cornfield and you can pray all you want with law of attraction. IT still not gonna work most of the time. What if we are looking at "beliefs" about women and it is a fundamental flaw? Just maybe, it is the principle?
Women are the "feeling" aspect of things. Men are the "object (end result)" aspect of things.
Give men.... porn and he completes the feeling aspect of him. Give men.... football(soccer) and he forgets about women. He doesn't need women. But reality, it hurts him if he wants to find a real women. So how does it plays for women?
Give women jobs ("object"), and she goes in a cycle.
Give women to park a car, she can't park it as well as men because of end result of parking the car. Her "object" is parking the car, there is no end result.
Given women sperm, and she breeds a baby. (Hilarious as this can be)
Give women inspiration, and she is inspirational
Women attracted to passion because it represents feelings. (which is them)
Women attracted to popular rock stars because it represents pillar, status and feelings/passion (which is them)
What if we were wrong all this while? Human history shows we are adaptable. Just maybe women replace men (object) with work?
Zac