- Joined
- Aug 15, 2018
- Messages
- 563
And it's a bit more complicated than texting. Let's talk apps!
I've recently learned that if you are in the US and you have an android phone you are a nobody. Women refuse to date men who don't have iPhones. In the rest of the world we use various chat apps which looks the same on both iPhone and Android but technically it's not texting. Texting cost much in most places. In the US if it's an iPhone to iPhone communication it's iMessage. You only text to your Android nobody friends. I mean this is the American perspective, not my personal view.
Messaging is a little more complicated than texting (unless you are an American iPhone/iMessage user) because first there is this dance to find out who uses which messaging app and for what purpose? Are you using messaging app A or B? OK, but do you use it for your family and closest friends or is it your app of choice to check up on your frenemies? This back and forth dance takes time and it doesn't help when you have say 2 to 3 minutes in a typical day game situation. That's quite a typical day game situation for me.
I live in a place with incoming tourists from everywhere. and they use every app. But even local people use the few apps they use in personally different ways (family and close friends or checking up on frenemies). I most appreciate the kind of girls who could be the Instagram queens but refuse to be on the platform because they find it too shallow. Luckily these girls though are a rare breed, they aren't fiction. The reality is that you can't have life in every platform including the ones you use once in a blue moon. Especially if you intend to maintain a second life. I think it's reasonable to assume that this is what most guys wanted to do if they seriously considered Instagram at all. Snapchat anyone? It has much less users than Instagram in the States, even much less elsewhere. Still some girls give me their Snapchats, girls otherwise I would have been interested in.
So I don't get why pickup instructors are so sloppy to still call it texting in 2019. I just don't understand it. I see no other explanation than they are just really sloppy to care to dissect the nuances between all the platforms people in reality use. Even pickup instructors who are not American. Sure most of these guys aren't social media experts, even though they could be. Heck, they should be. Chase's 2nd edition of texting book which just came out silently 2 weeks ago stills calls it texting. No, Chase. It's messaging.
I wonder if you have dedicated at least one chapter to the current messaging situation in the new edition of your book. Looking at the table of contents on Amazon: no, you didn't. It looks like your book describe the current situation exactly as if we went back in time 10 years (by the table of contents). Like texting was 10 years ago in the US as texting back and forth at length was never a thing most elsewhere before the arrival of the various chat apps.
What I've found you'll just have to skip a certain percentage of girls simply because there is no platform the two of you can agree as the best way to communicate compared to an ideal world where everyone would yeah, really texted. Is it your friendly or frenemies platform?
Even if a girl is receptive to you and she has more than 500 Instagram followers and you are a nobody on Instagram (and that's what most guys are compared to the average Instagram girl, it's just the basic dynamic of the platform) how warm is she going to be to text, pardon, message you there? OK, at least you had the guts to approach her in person compared to her other 500 hungry followers.
What's your overall strategy for all these platforms?
Advanced: voice messages.
I've recently learned that if you are in the US and you have an android phone you are a nobody. Women refuse to date men who don't have iPhones. In the rest of the world we use various chat apps which looks the same on both iPhone and Android but technically it's not texting. Texting cost much in most places. In the US if it's an iPhone to iPhone communication it's iMessage. You only text to your Android nobody friends. I mean this is the American perspective, not my personal view.
Messaging is a little more complicated than texting (unless you are an American iPhone/iMessage user) because first there is this dance to find out who uses which messaging app and for what purpose? Are you using messaging app A or B? OK, but do you use it for your family and closest friends or is it your app of choice to check up on your frenemies? This back and forth dance takes time and it doesn't help when you have say 2 to 3 minutes in a typical day game situation. That's quite a typical day game situation for me.
I live in a place with incoming tourists from everywhere. and they use every app. But even local people use the few apps they use in personally different ways (family and close friends or checking up on frenemies). I most appreciate the kind of girls who could be the Instagram queens but refuse to be on the platform because they find it too shallow. Luckily these girls though are a rare breed, they aren't fiction. The reality is that you can't have life in every platform including the ones you use once in a blue moon. Especially if you intend to maintain a second life. I think it's reasonable to assume that this is what most guys wanted to do if they seriously considered Instagram at all. Snapchat anyone? It has much less users than Instagram in the States, even much less elsewhere. Still some girls give me their Snapchats, girls otherwise I would have been interested in.
So I don't get why pickup instructors are so sloppy to still call it texting in 2019. I just don't understand it. I see no other explanation than they are just really sloppy to care to dissect the nuances between all the platforms people in reality use. Even pickup instructors who are not American. Sure most of these guys aren't social media experts, even though they could be. Heck, they should be. Chase's 2nd edition of texting book which just came out silently 2 weeks ago stills calls it texting. No, Chase. It's messaging.
I wonder if you have dedicated at least one chapter to the current messaging situation in the new edition of your book. Looking at the table of contents on Amazon: no, you didn't. It looks like your book describe the current situation exactly as if we went back in time 10 years (by the table of contents). Like texting was 10 years ago in the US as texting back and forth at length was never a thing most elsewhere before the arrival of the various chat apps.
What I've found you'll just have to skip a certain percentage of girls simply because there is no platform the two of you can agree as the best way to communicate compared to an ideal world where everyone would yeah, really texted. Is it your friendly or frenemies platform?
Even if a girl is receptive to you and she has more than 500 Instagram followers and you are a nobody on Instagram (and that's what most guys are compared to the average Instagram girl, it's just the basic dynamic of the platform) how warm is she going to be to text, pardon, message you there? OK, at least you had the guts to approach her in person compared to her other 500 hungry followers.
What's your overall strategy for all these platforms?
Do you actually call girls on the phone? If so in which part of the world you are?I've lost her from sight, the mall is just so busy and chaotic. But luckily I've stumbled upon her by accident in this big and bustling mall, now she was on her phone. In this part of the world when girls are out and about during the day they actually talk to people on the phone, too. Even the younger generation. I've heard it's different in the US, when even older people are mostly only texting.
Advanced: voice messages.
Last edited: