Chase, wanted to add some input here as I would definitely consider the service.
Others have mentioned infields before, and I think the earlier this happens the better. I have always enjoyed watching infield footage, and even with blurred faces, I always felt like it was extremely helpful. They also seem to draw significant interest on Youtube (in views). There are a number of reasons not to do it though. Knowing this site, I'm sure the production quality that you would aim for would make it a large effort. So alternatively, I think seeing you review/react-to daygame footage from the people that do post things on youtube would be incredibly valuable. I trust your reaction significantly more than random channels on youtube, and it would still provide many of the benefits that we could get from seeing
you do in-field, at a much lower cost to you (money and time). There are tons of new and olds videos out there to react to, and I would be extremely interested in hearing your opinion on people like
James Marshall,
Coach Kyle, or
James Tusk.
I think the in-field also offers some legitimacy to your viewpoints as well. I began reading your stuff on and off again ~8-9 years ago, back when I was like 16. Even before I had tested any of it, I always trusted your expertise in seduction. To be honest though, I'm not really sure why. I think part of it is that you do a very good job of framing the fundamentals from a very reasonable perspective, but some of the more technical articles were definitely foreign to my thinking at that age. Now, in my case, I eventually tested things and was obviously convinced, but Im not sure that is guaranteed for new users. I think given the number of laughable "gurus" that are out there, most people come in with a reasonable level of skepticism. I think original infields and/or reviews would definitely belay some concerns.
Just my fourty-five cents. Excited to see what you come up with regardless.
)