And a lot of great content will get watered down on main site or maybe taken down.
Same for forums being censored.
In past a lot of content has been taken down both on site and fourms when old members went rogue.
Ohh sucks damn political correctness and censorship
Not gonna happen.
The book is not tied directly to Girls Chase.
We are going to tell them to check out XYZ website we'll set up for book buyers that will take them through some kind of funnel starting with "are you a man or a woman" then send them to a Girls Chase offer if they're a man (probably One Date) and an offer for women if they're a woman (we'll probably go with one of
@Vision's offers for this).
I have already done some press, Wall Street Journal, some lesser interviews, I was on Australian national TV (lol), I am not worried about "is the media going to attack us? Do we need to water things down?" I have gone out of my way to make the site as mainstream accessible as possible since its inception without watering things down. It's why we've had so many tens of millions of visitors. Even the hit pieces people have attempted have really just glanced off us... like some chick who made an angry video about
my article telling dudes not to date chicks on pills or with mental problems. Her best argument was something like "oh so if a woman wants to improve herself and get on pills to get better she's not dateable?" and the comments were just a bunch of women going "Yeah! What's wrong with wanting to get better!" etc.
Honestly the kind of controversy we could generate over our content would be great. I wish we'd get folks trying to debate me on TV or what have you.
I am a debater. It is what I do.
Anyway, if I do mainstream interviews (big "IF"; they're not interested in PUA at all right now and there's no guarantee I could get a lot of MSM traction without having to spend a ton on PR, which I am not gonna do) and they try to derail into hostile interview territory that is NOT on topic for the book but is some kind of character assassination attempt I am just gonna walk out. Then they can decide if they want to post an interview of me walking out 3 minutes in and the reason why I did that or if they are just going to have to skip running that interview.
There is zero chance of "Oh no, he is teaching men to fuck women!" causing an uproar today though.
The controversy needle has moved over to angry incel guys and red pill.
Nobody cares about PUA anymore and in fact it is looked on as quaint.
A lot of women are out there now talking about how they miss pick up artists because "at least they liked women."
Some journalist wrote an article a few weeks ago that blew up on X about how "the pickup artist industry has died, and what's replaced it has been seriously unhealthy toxic misogynistic incels who truly hate women and red pill men who are almost as bad" and there were about a bajillion women commenting that "at least PUAs liked women" "at least pickup was self-improvement" "at least these guys got men to improve their lives" etc.
You never know how good you have it till it's gone, eh!
Honestly I think the biggest lightning rod around me and this book is that it is exclusively about heterosexual attraction, and that I put right in the beginning that the book is only about heterosexual attraction and that I know homosexuality is a really big thing right now but someone other than me would have to write that book.
That is the most in-narrative controversy lightning rod in the book -- that it does not deal with dudes wanting to bone each other; that is a very conspicuous missing aspect in today's society.
I would love to have some MSM mouthpiece try to nail me down on that one though. I already have the argument all fleshed out (I have a very funny little speech about how gay men definitely do not want me writing "the authoritative guide to gay sex" because I have absolutely no idea what I am talking about in that case, and there is no way I am going to unless I become gay, lol).
Chase
