What's new

FR+  First Time In New Venue, Almost Pull But Bad Logistics

Watts

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
147
This is my first public FR, so I appreciate feedback on both my game and the format, such as what to include more of and what to include less of.

Also this wound up longer than expected, so I may be including more things than needed, and/or should change the way I format it. I appreciate people taking the time to read it and give feedback.

Some background - Just starting to go out seriously again. A number of things including monogamy for a period, as well as moving contributed to this. So I'm also in the process of scouting out and locking down new venues (it was my first time at this place). Also, this is within the area with gay bars, and in fact we accidentally head to one of the nearby gay bars (didn't go in. also, don't let drunk girls lead, haha) before realizing we needed to go to another venue with a similar name (I'm willing to try going out to the gay bars too, but could use some specific advice as I'm not well versed in it).

Also this was a "one shot, one kill" type of night (even though I failed to pull, I believe it was there), in that the first non-working girl I opened I spent the rest of the night with. I always appreciate those. And I do feel socially warming up helps so that once I opening a girl I am interested in, I'm already loose.

Went out early, say 9:30-10:00PM (really my goal is 9:00-9:30PM, but I'm getting used to going out again), the place had not transitioned to the club atmosphere and dj, which it did around 10:30-11. Wearing gray chinos, gray merlino wool sweater (different shades), brown Chelsea boots, and a black peacoat that looks like a suit jacket (so I'm told) which is custom made to my measurements from a seamstress in Vietnam (based on a $600+ Italian coat worn by James Bond in Starfall, mine was $150).

Before going out I meditate, this time I think 10 mins, but ideally 30 with enough lead time. The idea is to clear my mind and be calm and focused. I then listen to fun music, edm and other stuff that puts me in a good mood, dance around a bit as I get ready.

In the uber I make a point to talk to the driver, relate at least, but joke and have fun if possible. Socially warm up.

Outside the venue a girl is smoking a juul and standing apart, I joke that she needs to get one last hit before she goes in. The guy to the side, who seems like he might work there, asks to hit it. I tell her she has to let him, that's the rule for juuling in front of someone. She doesn't respond. I continue to joke with him a bit. This is just me warming up and also potentially creating a connection with someone in the venue, the girl is not particularly attractive and with a guy. Side Note: I didn't do this, but I could have re-opened inside and been nicer instead of so challenging, particularly if she had an attractive friend (or friends). Also, I could have just done this to remove a potential negative if later in the night I met an attractive girl and she happened to be friends with this girl. Further, that could have been part of my social warmup.

I scope the place, many interconnected rooms, including three floors, and its basically two restaurant/bars back to back connected by a corridor with bathrooms. A big place, which I like as it gives me options and the ability to move around and find sets that I like.

The next interaction of note, I go to use the bathroom and the sinks are common while the men's and women's toilets are separate (I like this design, more opportunities to talk to girls). I joke to the two girls standing by the sinks as I walk in (hesitantly, again first time here and I don't know the place), that I didn't want to rush in if it was the women's room. Didn't want to be a pervert (or some such notion). They smiled and were friendly, again, warming up.

I'll note here that for me choosing to have these little interactions gets me out of my head and into social mode and into the moment. Then when I need to say or do something quickly, I'm better prepared.

I continue to explore the bar, and then I have the first flirtation of the night, but with a waitress/bartender who was working.

I came up to her to ask where the coat check was (which I legit wanted to know, but why not ask the attractive girl?), and she started explaining it. For a moment it's me bridging to how I'd be surprised if a nice place like this didn't have one, and I believe I make a comment like how as a "sophisticated older man" I appreciate it (or something like that), in order to turn it from professional to personal.

She bites and starts flirting a bit, saying she's older than me (a slight disqualification). This is actually standard with me, I look younger than I am (she guessed 27 or 28), where I am 34 soon to be 35. I get as young as mid to early 20's even.

I challenger her on this, saying I bet I'm older than she is (she looks late 20's, which for women is a bit old / past their prime in some sense, but definitely still looks good). Here I could have possibly attached something to this bet to get later compliance or just pump my state, for instance I could have said "The loser has to give the winner one sincere compliment", which then leads to either her showing interest or at least some fun banter, or me showing interest under the guise of losing the bet. Either way, that could have been useful for another step in the right direction.

So, she guesses 27 or 28, to which I respond "wrong decade". She complimented me, saying in a round about way that if I was 27 she wouldn't be interested but since I'm 34 she was (not in those exact words, and I don't remember her exact phrasing).
I actually rephrased it as "So if I was 27 I would just be cute, but not dateable, but since I'm 34 I'm handsome." This was a fun "assume the sale" line, and also showed knowledge of her experience and belief i.e. older men / younger women, which I share.
She said "that's what happens to men when they get into their 30's, they become handsome" to which I reply "what happens to women, and when?"
And she says "after 26 they get... real" (As an aside, I like her already. I appreciate a girl with a realistic view of dating and relationships).
I inquired what she meant about real and she said women in their late 20's "see through the bullshit" and also know how to pick the right guys.
To which I replay "Same happens to men in their 30's, but we're about 5 years behind" (she nods in agreement, of course, I'm roughly 5 years older than her, really 7, but it was more the concept and connection between us than the exact number). Framing compatibility and creating rapport right away.
I feel she was with it but she was setting up her bar.

Around this time this girl walks in (hbclassy) and I check her out, cute and nice body, and then she asks me if it's ok if she can take some chairs (they wanted to move chairs in order to put them at their friend's table). This may have been due to me talking to the bartender, me being dressed well with an almost suit jacket, me having a professional or commanding presence... or maybe she just thought I was cute (hadn't thought about that till now, but actually that would have been a good tease).

I then start in on how the chairs are very carefully arranged... by a designer flown in by France... to mimic the way Notre Dame was setup... but since they seem nice (and her friend is holding two chairs this whole time)... I'll make an exception. Plus I comment on her friend (hbshort) holding the chairs. I'm fun and flirting with them for just a little while longer, and then I go back to the bartender. She is setting up still, and busy, so I tell her I will come back to her later.

I explore the bar (first time there), go to coat check, don't check my coat (they had a problem), and just have little joking exchanges with people (the coat check girl, guys in line). And then I make my way back to the original area of the bar (resolved to not check my coat if it meant waiting any longer).

I start with the bartender, who I know it was on with, and get water, change, tip her and then she immediately leaves (still setting up apparently, she later came back with some more bottles). I talk to her replacements for a minute, getting the lay of the land, and then I go over to the other bar with the chair girl is with her friend. I smoothly cut in next to my target between another guy, with her friend on the right. And from here I get to work (I spent the next 3-4 hours with this girl).

At the start I spoke to them both, hbclassy next to me and her friend on her other side. I let lie the idea that maybe I did work there for a while, it could make a good callback or spike. So we all chatted for a bit, I could tell hbclassy was into me (I don't think her friend would have minded either), but it was nothing too complex just basic flirting. Complimented her, some light teasing (of them both), worked in a nice self-compliment about my eyes that hbclassy agreed with. Generally felt a very friendly vibe from her.

I qualified her on her personality, which I genuinely liked, and it gradually turned into me and her talking more and her friend contributing less (although I kept her engaged a bit). Then I asked what she did, and it turns out we were in the same industry. We bonded over this, we were both excited as we're both passionate about what we do, and I then went overt and direct:

"I liked you before when you were just attractive with a good personality. Now that I know we're both in _____, I'm really interested."

Now, this had the effect of really hooking her strongly, but it also may have created too much of a boyfriend frame. Truthfully I do actually like having someone to collaborate with, and we could probably help each other, but I know the real connection will come from penis in vagina, and that should be my priority. Planning too far in the future, without getting that done first, can be bad.

In her returning my interest, her friend sees this as the opportunity to excuse herself, and goes to talk to the rest of the group (about 4-6 other girls, maybe a guy or two, didn't pay attention). I then decide to get another water, and I offer to get her a drink (we're still both at the bar) at the same time (which I consider just standard socially, but especially now that we're making our interest overt. Also, she doesn't try to abuse this). I don't remember if I bought her one then or if she was still rather full. Either way, I get my water, and the lights get lower and the music louder.

At this point I suggest we move to a place "A little quieter" where we can both hear each other better. This is somewhere that the weather works against me, because going outside is not really an option (but is closer to a pull, and more secluded. With an outside smoking area or after we both finish or drinks, this could be good). However I settle for leading her to a long cushioned booth by one of the entrances. She tells her friends before we go, and once there we are out of their view and more or less isolated.

I sit down with my legs facing outwards, she sits with upper body and legs facing me, on the diagonal. Good sign of body language.

We talk and flirt for a while. She's easy and compliant. Laughs plenty. Nothing fancy here. I do take advantage of the leg closest to me which I feel she's "offering me" by resting my hand on it and stroking it gently from time to time.

At some point she wants to show me pictures of her work (again, we have this in common), and when she takes out her phone I use that as an excuse to exchange numbers. Now, I didn't have to do this, and in fact there may be something to be said to not doing this and having that tension there, but I could see it was on and I didn't want her group of friends to mess it up later.

Actually, this speaks to a greater issue, which is I should have been screening logistics better at this point. At this point I didn't know her friend was staying with her, and I didn't even know her relationship to her other friends. I think my thought process was mentioning them may lead to her thinking about them and to her thinking we should rejoin them i.e. bursting our little bubble. I don't think this is accurate in the cold analysis of right now, but I believe that was my thought then. Further, knowing the logistics was probably worth the risk.


So as we go through that, and she shows me her work, it turns out we have a common friend, one who is fairly close to both of us. This was a very fun revelation, in the sense that we met without their knowledge or setup but they would be happy if we got together, but may have been a double edged sword. So on the one hand while I'm now even more safe from this connection, if she was considering fast sex with me, she may choose not to do so for fear of reputation backlash.

At this point she suggests that we don't tell them we've met, but that we meet them out at a bar and I just come in and reveal that I know her (she may or may not have suggested we kiss at that). I suggest if we do that, I just walk up without saying a word and make out with her, and use as an example that sailor coming back from WW2 picture. She agrees with this. I then say that before I agree to this know, I need to know if she's a good kisser (turns out she really isn't! lol), and from here is a simple kiss close (her only objection is that it's only one kiss, she winds up kissing me four times, was not in any rush to stop. Also I could have been more conscious here of it and pulled back first).

On the kiss close, I go back and forth with it. On the one hand it creates the "It's On Moment" cred: 60yoc, but on the other it does release some tension, give her some validation, perhaps removes some mystery. I'm willing to hear different opinions on it i.e. should I make kissing her conditional on her leaving with me. And the other part, some girls are just shy about kissing in public, especially with a guy they are just meeting.

From here we have lots of relating and rapport, perhaps too much with me squandering the opportunity for setting some good frames or some good SOT's, or a push for that matter.

I think the "purity gambit" would have been good here,

SOT's like the honestly one I discussed with @Bacchus https://www.skilledseducer.com/threads/poetic-injustice.21808/

The "who is the lucky one" with @Teevster https://www.skilledseducer.com/thre...discussing-old-lay-reports.21915/#post-107574

TVA: yeah, something really natural! I am not very much into getting laid, I mean if I get laid, she is the lucky one because I am going to fuck the shit out of her! but if I don't get any laid I don't really care, because I have some cool female friends (okey I wasn't sure if i would get away with this one

Or just some general non-judgmental sexual frames such as my new favorite one also from the same thread with Teevster.

"Why is it cool for me to lay 10 girls, and bad if you do so... by the way you really deserves it.", all would have been better to do here. I feel I spent too much time in comfort when I could have moved the seduction forward.

And I did use the "relaxed, expressive and enthusiastic" from Glow but not till later in the night. https://www.skilledseducer.com/threads/seduction-oriented-topics.21690/


Also at some point she asks me if I'm a "thrill seeker", to which I reply "not in most things, probably business and romance are the only two. I'm excited to make money and also to meet a beautiful woman and be swept up in a passionate romance." She likes this answer. I ask her if she is one, to which she replies she is, and I ask her how. She then says she wants to go skydiving, and asks if I would go. I say "sure, let's go tomorrow, but we need to get up early for something like that so you'll have to sleep over." (this is all before I know her logistics by the way). She wants me to pinky promise, to which I'm hesitant (I don't know why, I could just lie to get out of it the next day, I'm not just going to jump out of a plane with this girl! lol), all the while I'm saying "but you have to spend the night." This kind of fades away.

Our relating continues, and hbshorty comes up to "check on us". She mentions our common friend, I say "we're very compatible" (to her agreement), all parties seem satisfied but again, too much boyfriend not enough lover and missed opportunities for good sexual frames. It may be here that her friend mentions going to the other bar, or they just mention going to the dance floor, I don't remember. Either way, they leave and we stay for a bit, continue to talk, and then decide to follow them after using the bathroom.

It is at this point I believe she mentions that hbshorty is staying with her.

I didn't consider a bathroom pull here, or any serious escalation, but something might have been possible if I had used the previous isolation more effectively.

We then find her friends on the dance floor. Her one friend gets low and starts popping her ass aggressively, I look instinctively, and she notices (and doesn't like it). I say "I noticed her dancing, not her. I like looking at you." and then she dances a bit with enthusiasm (she actually was on her college's dance team).

Now here's where I think the actual pull was make or break:

Her friend came over and said they were thinking about going to another bar, more of a club, down the street. It would be a loud dancing place. Now my excuse to not go was that we were having a great conversation (we were) and that place isn't built for talking. If we stayed at the first bar it would also mean total isolation with my girl. Basically, I believe I could have pulled like that.

What I wanted to do, which I've done before, is to pull my girl, fuck her, and then bring her back to her friend as if nothing happened. This was 100% possible, at this time of night it was around 12, 2 hours from bars closing. What I didn't do is A) pursued this full force once her friend mentioned it (I laid the groundwork saying it was louder there, and not our scene, but I needed to make it airtight) and B) when the moment of truth came, I didn't push it with the friend for concern of coming off poorly.

The objection was that her friend was staying with her and wouldn't be able to get back to her house, even though they were in a large group of girls. I mentioned giving her friend her address, but I felt it came off poorly at the time. I should have had my girl get a text ready with her address, and then had her tell her friend the plan (not do it myself). This is my guess, I'm open to alternative solutions.

Regardless, we all agreed to go to the other bar together.

While there her and I danced very close but she was careful not to kiss me in front of her friends (not that I cared much, and actually there really is no good reason to kiss her in front of them and plenty of reasons not to). Plenty of grinding though.

I saw a girl approach our group, who may have known someone in it, who looked vaguely familiar. Funny enough I knew I had met her before, but couldn't place where (I've narrowed it down to two possibilities), and I just figured it was probably at least vaguely negative haha (like, a girl I was talking to where it didn't work out). So at that point I told my girl I wanted to get a drink of water, and she followed me.

At the bar, and here is an example of how dressing well helps, one guy gave up his spot because he liked the way I dressed (and I've been getting a mix of compliments and challenges on my fashion lately, which I see as a positive).

Here she asks me why I don't drink. I tell her I'll tell her when she kisses me (again). She says maybe she'll kiss me. I tell her she will, and not to deny me affection, haha (playing around with dominance, but perhaps hurt me later. Regardless, she was being coy). She kisses me, and I move her over to a quiet place to talk.

I tell her I gave up drinking years ago when I realized it was something I do to release tension and be social, after a week of being tense and not social. I didn't like the pattern. She related to this and agreed she felt the same way. I think this question was asked because she felt odd that I was buying her an alcoholic drink but not drinking myself, and thought that might mean I was going to take advantage of her (a common notion with me not drinking and being at bars). Anyway, I think she was satisfied.

At this point I decided to take things sexual. I started with the relaxed, expressive and enthusiastic SOT, stating that her outfit was sexy yet classy, and that it seemed to me she was relaxed and expressive about her sexuality, that it meant I could be relaxed and expressive with mine, and that she and I could be enthusiastic together. This went over well. I then asked her if there was anything she didn't like sexually (decided to start there), to which she pushed back a little "why are we talking about this", and I replied "because I want to know if there are things not to do before we do them. Like I don't want to go down on you and then you tell me you don't like that" (she started to get excited by this).

She says she does like it when guys go down on her, but there was one guy who was all about her feet (haha). So I said, "I'm more of a boob guy. Which works out, since you have nice boobs." (She had already told me they were her favorite physical asset of hers, and they were very nice).

I then ask her about what she does like, she tells me hard sex, generally. Getting picked up. Thrown down. I also inquire about choking, which she says she likes, also hair pulling. She then tells me how when she cut her hair she realized she couldn't have her hair pulled like that anymore. And then, she went to her housemate and showed her that her hair couldn't be pulled anymore, haha. I asked how much information they share, and she said she knows when she brings guys back home, to which I reply "how many guys?" (and with a smile, not serious) which is open to interpretation for the answer but she actually ignores it (which is a good time to mention I never asked about her relationship history or status, just assumed she was single and went from there. A little background might have been useful).

At this point I ask her if she has any fantasies she hasn't tried, she starts to think and then hbshorty comes up. She's just complaining about creepy guys hitting on her on the dance floor. She asks her to come with her, and I say we're actually really enjoying it here (talking). And I can see my girl is a little torn, she mentions going to see people "who are only here for the night" (honestly don't know if she meant hbshorty or any of her other friends, again didn't probe logistics well), and I tell her "it's up to her" Could maybe have lead or been more dominant here.

We go back to the dance floor and I protect her from a drunk guy. Her friend actually thinks she needs to protect her from me and comes over to her, she sends her away (she tells me she didn't realize we were together already). She's a bit colder here, not grinding as much on me. My thought is that I overcooked her a little. I got her hot and bothered with the sex talk and then we went back to her friends, so then she's thinking that if we leave together we're probably going to have sex. But she doesn't think she wants that.

So when the lights go on, she stands in place and tells me we aren't going home together. I actually have to persuade her to come back to our original quiet spot to talk, because we really can't talk there, and I don't like this 180 attitude shift. We go over and then comes some of the good old standby's:

"I'm not that type of girl."
"I've been fucked over before, had sex too soon when I wanted a relationship."
the impractical
"What am I going to do, throw hbshorty out of the bed?"
and even
"I'm not going home with someone random" - I push back hard on this. Telling her it's insulting to call me someone random. And she apologizes.

Also, generally it was clear she was triggered, not feeling very good after we had come off the dance floor.

Edit: One somewhat successful frame I set here, in response to the above was to say I wanted passion in a relationship, that a good relationship always starts with passion, and that I want my women to be passionate. I feel this was helping some, although too little too late.

But I do feel that application of some of the better frames would have helped here. Also, had I gotten separation at 12 (instead being with the group at 2), I think I could have pulled on a plausible premise within 30 minutes of true isolation.

Another development is hbshorty came over and tried to take her to the bathroom. She said she didn't need to go. Hbshorty said come with me anyway. She said "No". So hbshorty leaves us alone.

Hbclassy suggests we meet soon but not stay over tonight, we discuss a late lunch tomorrow (never materializes), and leave it at that.

However on leaving my phone messes up with uber, so she reluctantly agrees to share and uber and then have me go home afterwards (she thinks even with this I can't be trusted, a real change). I wasn't even thinking of pushing this, since she was being way too erratic for my taste and I really don't know what her issues were/are. But we take an uber back to her place, I stay in it and then go home.

One possible change in her attitude I thought might have been that girl who I vaguely knew who might have knew a girl from the group, and that being part of the interference that happened when we returned to the dancefloor.

Finally, while we are in the uber, some other guy sends her a picture of him, telling her he's in town. He has some corny nickname for her so I say "is he gay", to which she responds "no" but agrees the nickname is bad/weird. I think about amoging some, but just let it go. Of course I also considered that she was going to meet up with him instead after, but she didn't leave my side the whole night (except in the bathroom in the first spot) and unless she sneakily checked her phone while she was on the dancefloor, I don't think that was what derailed me. But it's possible I suppose.

On a personal level it does make me disengage with any serious texting, knowing that there was a chance for an SNL and a real connection (and great experience) between us, and now she expects me to "get in line" or submit to the boyfriend interview process.

The next day I did wake up and text her about lunch, and she responded 30 mins prior with a long message about "not seeing this", that she dropped off hbshorty and was headed back to her parents, but "Definitely still want to meet up sometime!!".

I'm not optimistic (or enthusiastic) about it, but that's where it stands.

Key Points:

  • I have to remember to check off all the boxes. I know to get logistics but I didn't do it. A consequence of rust.
  • Make good use of my time in isolation. I remember reading something by @K__ a while ago about doing just the minimal amount of comfort to let her know I wasn't a serial killer. That would have been good advice here.
  • Building on the previous point, there are a ton of good SOT's and sexual routines that I could have used there, I need to be more diligent about getting through them because they will prevent some common objections "I'm not that type of girl" and also build excitement.
  • I knew the right move but I wasn't willing to risk for it, and I already had her number. So worst case if I pushed for us to stay here, or said "I'm staying here, I really don't like that place" there was always the possibility of texting later for a meetup. And it was early enough and with no shortage of cute girls.
  • See clearly the consequences of going sexual but not pulling. There was another possibility that had I stuck more stubbornly to us hanging out together, and her telling me her fantasies, I could have kept turning her on to the point where the fact that we'd have to fuck on the couch would have been a moot point. Actually, her roommate was gone, so really she had a spare bed anyway, and I didn't even think of that because again, I was reacting to logistics instead of planning ahead.

All constructive comments and insights welcome.
 
Last edited:

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
1,781
God it was long... and detailed.

In my opinion, if you want to make such long report, you need to add titles for the reader to kind of split up the text.
You giving so you much details is good, however I personally prefer just skimming over less important aspects of the night such as detailing too much the flirting with the wardrobe girl. In my reports I would just say "I chatted up the wardrobe girl".


Some background - Just starting to go out seriously again. A number of things including monogamy for a period, as well as moving contributed to this. So I'm also in the process of scouting out and locking down new venues

When I moved to Paris, I did that. One day of the week end you go to venues you know to get a pull, the other you scout 2-3 venues. Use google maps, map 3 clubs that are near each other and go there.

(I'm willing to try going out to the gay bars too, but could use some specific advice as I'm not well versed in it).

Make a thread - Top gaygamers - me, Carousel, Maximillian (will post soon)

Actually, this speaks to a greater issue, which is I should have been screening logistics better at this point. At this point I didn't know her friend was staying with her, and I didn't even know her relationship to her other friends. I think my thought process was mentioning them may lead to her thinking about them and to her thinking we should rejoin them i.e. bursting our little bubble. I don't think this is accurate in the cold analysis of right now, but I believe that was my thought then. Further, knowing the logistics was probably worth the risk.

The first mistake of the night.

Use the good old "How do you guy know each" from mystery. So much key info to acquire from this.

She agrees with this. I then say that before I agree to this know, I need to know if she's a good kisser (turns out she really isn't! lol),

Bad kisser usually correlates with ASD. This is because good kissers obviously have more experience, hence less affraid to just jump into it.

Also at some point she asks me if I'm a "thrill seeker", to which I reply "not in most things, probably business and romance are the only two. I'm excited to make money and also to meet a beautiful woman and be swept up in a passionate romance." She likes this answer. I ask her if she is one, to which she replies she is, and I ask her how. She then says she wants to go skydiving, and asks if I would go. I say "sure, let's go tomorrow, but we need to get up early for something like that so you'll have to sleep over." (this is all before I know her logistics by the way). She wants me to pinky promise, to which I'm hesitant (I don't know why, I could just lie to get out of it the next day, I'm not just going to jump out of a plane with this girl! lol), all the while I'm saying "but you have to spend the night." This kind of fades away.

Honestly, you jumped from 0 to almost 100 in a second here. From subtle flirting, to her sleeping over can be a big one for her to swallow. I would have escalated the vibe more gradually. A sexual frame would ease this. I am missing a stronger sexual frame in this interaction.

Too much rapport! rapport = kills the excitement, and can eventually set anti-sexual frames. Really not the way I personally like to do things. here is what you need:
- More spikes (what ever ways you like
- More useful frames. The only frame you got here is "cool, cute guy, whom I have rapport with". It usually won't be enough for a woman, who generally is risk averse to say "yes" to sleep over.

The thrill seeker part was good, but not enough in my book.

At this point I suggest we move to a place "A little quieter" where we can both hear each other better. This is somewhere that the weather works against me, because going outside is not really an option (but is closer to a pull, and more secluded. With an outside smoking area or after we both finish or drinks, this could be good). However I settle for leading her to a long cushioned booth by one of the entrances. She tells her friends before we go, and once there we are out of their view and more or less isolated.

This was a good move, to move her... gradually. I think you should do this more if you can... the more you move her around the better. This is a better form of rapport, because it does not make things boring, but actually connect. Work talk is not a good way of seducing.... because it triggers anchors... anchors of professionalism and naturally reminds her of work. You really should not do that.

On the kiss close, I go back and forth with it. On the one hand it creates the "It's On Moment" cred: 60yoc, but on the other it does release some tension, give her some validation, perhaps removes some mystery. I'm willing to hear different opinions on it i.e. should I make kissing her conditional on her leaving with me. And the other part, some girls are just shy about kissing in public, especially with a guy they are just meeting.

Good, but building more tension and denying her validation by not kissing her would have been even more powerful.
- Touch her
- Get close to her lips...
- eye contact

And not kiss.. but instead an IOM moment would be better.

However, this is a good spike, good escalation. But escalation, unless if it is getting explicit can only get you as far as this...
You either have... to...
- Get more explicit (and keeping in mind to make her touch you as well - mutual escalation). Now you may not always be "allowed" to get to that point, either because of her compliance level (resistance etc) or the social setting. To handle the first one, sexual frames are the key to up compliance and dissolve resistance. To the second issue: further isolation
- If this is not possible - then you need to work with sexual tension. You must use and abuse this. CREATE THAT POWERFUL bubble.
- Or, keep it verbal all the way, and work with stimulating language and words, and set the frames.

Basically as 60 would say, keep it non-verbal, and don't break the tension, unless you sexualize the verbals (he saw my sex talk as the only legit verbal game - lol)

The reason 60 did not like verbal, was because:
- Cocky and funny lines, like witty shit would kill the tension. True, although it can accomplish other things. Not my style anyway so I do not care.
- And lots of rapport guys use is rapport based, which KILLS the sexual tension. Too much rapport is bad. Only build the necessary minimum of rapport, and leave it at that, and only build more rapport if it is necessary! other wise don't.

Another suggestion is to fractionate back and forth between stimulating subjects, and rapport talk.
Stimulation => rapport => stimulation => rapport... and so on... how often you can switch between both is up to you. Quick fractionation is ideal (i.e. switch in short intervals) although finishing a gambit or at least almost finishing it may oftentimes be favored.

I didn't consider a bathroom pull here, or any serious escalation, but something might have been possible if I had used the previous isolation more effectively.

Yes the vibe was not up for it.

Her friend came over and said they were thinking about going to another bar, more of a club, down the street. It would be a loud dancing place. Now my excuse to not go was that we were having a great conversation (we were) and that place isn't built for talking. If we stayed at the first bar it would also mean total isolation with my girl. Basically, I believe I could have pulled like that.

Here is a fact: You never know how much time you have with a girl. Hence, you must start escalating things quicker - at the first moment of interest. I always assume I am short on time, and do all I can to deliver as much as possible in the less amount of time. Of course I do not go faster than I technically can - you want to stay calibrated - but you always want to push things as fast as you possibly can.

And here, you absolutely could! I mean she allowed herself to be isolated with you, in addition to seeming receptive. That's a hook my man.

From what I am reading, you need more PUNCH.

Regardless, we all agreed to go to the other bar together.

I wouldn't. I would have called "sunk cost". Bad logistics is bad logistics. Move on. But that's a sidenote.

Here she asks me why I don't drink. I tell her I'll tell her when she kisses me (again). She says maybe she'll kiss me. I tell her she will, and not to deny me affection, haha (playing around with dominance, but perhaps hurt me later. Regardless, she was being coy). She kisses me, and I move her over to a quiet place to talk.

Really not my style - asking for a kiss. You want her to want to kiss you. Kissing is GIVING her validation (all you get is pump up her buyers temperature a bit for a few minutes, and... create a weak IOM - hand-grabbing is better).

I tell her I gave up drinking years ago when I realized it was something I do to release tension and be social, after a week of being tense and not social. I didn't like the pattern. She related to this and agreed she felt the same way. I think this question was asked because she felt odd that I was buying her an alcoholic drink but not drinking myself, and thought that might mean I was going to take advantage of her (a common notion with me not drinking and being at bars). Anyway, I think she was satisfied.

Bad social frame - which can make her feel uncomfortable. Why is he buying me a drink. Here it would have been better if you did not drink, or bought a non-alcoholic drink.

"why are we talking about this"

Not good. It is a bit of a force frame right there. I very rarely get this, especially with a girl who I have spent so much time with, venue changed with.

I will let you know exactly why this happened, and pay close attention to this:

1. Transition is way too bold. Have some better transitions ready. At best use more thread-cutting (i.e. bridge into topics that get you closer and closer to the subject you actually want to introduce). You introduced some very hardcore sex talk right away. You also forced sexual rapport - have you asked yourself: What have you done to make her feel allowed to open up? Nothing. Which is why I did not go that smootly.

2. You start talking about sex way too late - the later you wait to set a sexual frame, the harder it is, because you will have other frames, such as "rapport" based frames (cool nice guy to talk to) that will stick (due to time passing - which reinforces a frame) and contradict a sexual frame. You are acting so non-sexual for such a while (ok you did escalate and kiss eventually) and now suddently you turn all hyper sexual by asking what type of sex she likes. Cognitive dissonance.

3. You managed to set a sexual frame, but not a good one. Remember you want to set a clear sexual frame, although you want to leave your level of SEXUAL interest in her ambivalent. Preferably, set a sexual frame (and make sure she accept it by for example qualifying to it) BEFORE you start displaying (sexual interest). Here you are clearly displaying interest. Not only did you already kiss her (which was NOT necessary), but you also talk about sex as "you and her". The rule of thumb of sex talk is:

Never communicate that you intend to fuck her, but only that you can, and that you are really god damn good at it, if and only if she is complying to both you and your key frames.

In my older reports, I did show some more explicit interest, but I did get more ASD kicks and resistance. Note also that back in the days, I balanced out my display of interest with disqualification and signs of disinterest - basically PUSH and PULL.

Read this.

You did not follow this rule. You should have:
- Opened and hooked
- Moving her around good
- Set the verbal sexual frame

And then kiss her and escalate things.

You did things in the wrong around, and escalating and kissing her, as well as the mistake of showing too much sexual interest by talking about "you and her" in a sexual context, sat some frames that:
- Causes ASD
- kills a bit of tension
- Kills compliance.

And as you mention you got an ASD kick later.

This is something I would have predicted reading this.

and I replied "because I want to know if there are things not to do before we do them

NO NO NO.

A better response would be:
"Because I find sex to be a fascinating subject! And each person have a different sexual persona, and I am curious about different people's sexual persona! - sex is interesting... and nobody can disagree with that".

Like I don't want to go down on you and then you tell me you don't like that" (she started to get excited by this).

Too direct. Yes they get excited... yes! of course! and that's a good.

But it also triggers her anti-slut defense and her female state-control mode

I asked how much information they share, and she said she knows when she brings guys back home, to which I reply "how many guys?" (and with a smile, not serious) which is open to interpretation for the answer but she actually ignores it

NEVER inquire about her sex life with other men, unless she willingly tells you about it. This question made her uncomfortable. Hence she ignored it.

At this point I ask her if she has any fantasies she hasn't tried, she starts to think and then hbshorty comes up. She's just complaining about creepy guys hitting on her on the dance floor. She asks her to come with her, and I say we're actually really enjoying it here (talking). And I can see my girl is a little torn, she mentions going to see people "who are only here for the night"

To me, this is typical female state control (FSC) taking place - caused by you being too direct and triggering her defense mechanism.

You want to boil the frog slowly, else it just jumps out. Her the frog jumped out.

She's a bit colder here, not grinding as much on me. My thought is that I overcooked her a little. I got her hot and bothered with the sex talk and then we went back to her friends, so then she's thinking that if we leave together we're probably going to have sex. But she doesn't think she wants that.

You are totally right.

ASD and FSC taking place.

Was predicted :)

So when the lights go on, she stands in place and tells me we aren't going home together. I actually have to persuade her to come back to our original quiet spot to talk, because we really can't talk there, and I don't like this 180 attitude shift. We go over and then comes some of the good old standby's:

The failure here was not caused by her logistics! But her resisting. She was into you but you overcooked her. She resisted.

"I'm not that type of girl."
"I've been fucked over before, had sex too soon when I wanted a relationship."
the impractical
"What am I going to do, throw hbshorty out of the bed?"
and even
"I'm not going home with someone random" - I push back hard on this. Telling her it's insulting to call me someone random. And she apologizes

It is dead. Resistance all over the place. FSC is more deadly than ASD because ASD is generally communicate as concern. FSC causes 180 degree turns.

But I do feel that application of some of the better frames would have helped here. Also, had I gotten separation at 12 (instead being with the group at 2), I think I could have pulled on a plausible premise within 30 minutes of true isolation

Agreed. Not sure you could have pulled her, but you surely had higher chances.

Another development is hbshorty came over and tried to take her to the bathroom.

Typical FSC.

MUST READ:
All the articles listed in the list at the beginning of this article
This article about sex talk.
This report

There is more, but this should do for now.

Hbclassy suggests we meet soon but not stay over tonight, we discuss a late lunch tomorrow (never materializes), and leave it at that.

She is most likely being polite. Women her age usually are. She will most likely flake.

However on leaving my phone messes up with uber, so she reluctantly agrees to share and uber and then have me go home afterwards (she thinks even with this I can't be trusted, a real change).

Not a good frame.

The next day I did wake up and text her about lunch, and she responded 30 mins prior with a long message about "not seeing this", that she dropped off hbshorty and was headed back to her parents, but "Definitely still want to meet up sometime!!".

Meh.

Make good use of my time in isolation. I remember reading something by K a while ago about doing just the minimal amount of comfort to let her know I wasn't a serial killer. That would have been good advice here.

Yes! just like what I am saying... only the necessary amount of rapport.


Good:
- Persistance
- Escalation
- The hook
- Isolation

Bad:
- The order - escalating before sex talk (you can escalate WHILE doing sex talk)
- Too much rapport
- Kissing her when it was not necessary (only is when you REALLY need that little short spike)
- Talk about "work"
- Too much sexual intent... "me and you fucking each other" type of frame
- Unsmooth transition.
- Forcing sexual rapport, without:
a) setting a frame that allows her to do it.
b) frame yourself as a sexual guy with high sexual value.

Remember.. the key to sex talk is primarily:
- Display sexual prizing
- Reduce resistance.

You may also read my report posted here on GC - the anniversary report.

Overall, the issue here was not logistics, but resistance.

Not a bad performance - especially considering the rust. I am focusing more on the mistakes than the good, since it is a priority of fixing them. But there were other good aspects, such as warming up and all that. Good body language analysis too (better than mine lol).

Best,
 

Watts

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
147
Thank you for taking the time to do this. I was in the process of responding to another of our threads. And I really appreciate the detailed breakdown.

It's my first public FR and when I do them for myself I use much less detail, but then again I don't have to convey nearly as much to myself.

I'll be much more concise (and/or use titles) with the next one.

I'll respond in more detail to this all in a bit.
 

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
1,781
Notice that in the report I linked to I made sure to:
- Introduce the subject quickly of sex quickly -but not forcing it in - still remaining calibrated.
- Did not ask her what she liked iwth sex until I hit a compliance spike
- Did not ask her she liked with sex until I displayed sexually liberated attiude, and made her feel "allowed" to get sexual with me.
- Notice I did not EVER communicate anything that she and I would have sex... I always talked about "what women like", "what I like with women", oftentimes talking about "she" (could be any girl) rather than talking about "her" when discussing sex. Especially when it is explicit. I never show interest that I intend to fuck her, but that I could, if things goes the right way (all while communicating sexual skills, knowledge and good sexual attitude - i.e. sexual prizing). Hence, following the script of the post on how to deliver sex talk I linked to.

Edit: the report I posted is a style of sex talk that is somewhere between my current style (smooth) and my old style (explicit). My latest style would be the anniversary one, since it is my latest report.

My latest pull could be summarized as:
Opening
3 min rapport
Submission gambit
Purity gambit
Mental Gspot (pointing how the real g-spot is in her head and discussing the importance of the mental aspect of orgasms - mentioning how most men got it wrong... they only focus on getting her horny, but not focusing on making her feel allowed - need to write down this powerful gambit!)
More rapport
Escalation (no kiss until getting home)
Pull.

Best,
 
Last edited:

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
1,781
Thank you for taking the time to do this. I was in the process of responding to another of our threads. And I really appreciate the detailed breakdown.

It's my first public FR and when I do them for myself I use much less detail, but then again I don't have to convey nearly as much to myself.

I'll be much more concise (and/or use titles) with the next one.

I'll respond in more detail to this all in a bit.

The part where you discuss the actual seduction process with the target of the night was perfectly detailed and entertaining (good job on the writing there). Everything BEFORE was a bit... dry... (and should have been shortened) :)
 
Last edited:

Velasco

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
1,052
when she takes out her phone I use that as an excuse to exchange numbers. Now, I didn't have to do this, and in fact there may be something to be said to not doing this and having that tension there, but I could see it was on and I didn't want her group of friends to mess it up later.

This is a risk you have to be willing to take. Her groups coming in to mess up your set can certainly make the number exchange difficult. However, it can be overcome with a simple, "hey guys can I just say goodbye to her really quick?" - then discreetly take her number down (because your chances of pulling her tonight are over). By getting her number here (which may have been fine a couple years ago before the monogamy stage of your life), you are killing that urgency (which can be crucial for SNLs). She's got your number. what's the rush? She can always just text you to hang out another day. At least that's what she'll tell herself....

knowing the logistics was probably worth the risk.

yup. if you are planning on pulling her back to her place. you really want to find out if her roommate (or in this case, her friend that is staying with her) is out with her tonight. Because at the end of the night, when you are both heading to her place. It can create awkwardness. Not to mention if you didn't even bother to game the roommate. If she doesn't like you, she can simply "is he coming home with us"? which can trigger ASD. And then her, not wanting to look like a slut, will change her mind and ask for your number instead. So always make it a point to ask for her roommate in these cases. to know who you have to win over to prevent cockblocking/state breaks. A simple, "is she your roommate?" will do. She can correct you, "no that's my roommate over there" "no my roommate is sleeping" or "I don't have a roommate". So it gives gives you a better idea of what's possible.

She then says she wants to go skydiving, and asks if I would go. I say "sure, let's go tomorrow, but we need to get up early for something like that so you'll have to sleep over." (this is all before I know her logistics by the way). She wants me to pinky promise, to which I'm hesitant (I don't know why, I could just lie to get out of it the next day, I'm not just going to jump out of a plane with this girl! lol)

lol she didn't really mean it. Just talking about skydiving gave her good emotions. So in that moment she really wanted to do it. The next morning. ehhh not so much. You telling her the following morning, "hey get up silly. we're going skydiving today, remember?" will get you a "huh?" reaction outta her lol.

I didn't consider a bathroom pull here, or any serious escalation, but something might have been possible if I had used the previous isolation more effectively.

yeah. here if you had known that her pulling back to her place (due to not spending time winning over the friend) or pulling her back to your place (she has to go back to her place because friend) was unlikely, you'd have taken this into account, and switch to a more aggressive sexual game, and play the 'spike her BT through the roof' game to get her to comply for the fast bathroom pull instead.

The objection was that her friend was staying with her and wouldn't be able to get back to her house, even though they were in a large group of girls.

I'm guessing its because your girl was the only one who had the key to the apartment? and her friend wouldn't be able to get in otherwise.

While there her and I danced very close but she was careful not to kiss me in front of her friends

Yeah so that ASD shit I talked about earlier was a real objection with this girl. That you needed to have handled. This her not wanting to makeout with you in front of her friends shit (you'll notice that girls who ARE willing to makeout with you in front of their friends don't really have as much ASD as other chicks. And therefore you can get away with taking a girl home without having to set an non-judgemental frame first) should have ring bells in your head that this girl definitely cares about being judged for doing "slutty" shit.

So taking all this into account, the winning move I see are (After inquiring about logistics):

Win over HBshorty
Set nonjudgemental frame with HBclassy
Go with them back to their place and bang HBclassy in the spare room.
 

Watts

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
147
I just want to say here, after reading your breakdown once Teevster, I feel like a caveman.

Like show interest, get the girl alone, spike her bt, pull her out! lol

And it even works sometimes!

But yeah, the fact that I'm rusty and clearly not as smooth or strategic as I have been, combined with a large amount I have to learn about verbals and otherwise... it's humbling.

Thank you for the honesty and taking the time.

And also, thanks Velasco, will respond to all these points as I carefully consider them.
 

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
1,781
Win over HBshorty

I agree.... this is also something Watts could have focused more on - befriending and establishing rapport with shorty. Could have helped with the logistical situation, but also reduced the potential resistance he encountered. Women are less prone to ASD or FSC when they see that their friends not only accept you, but actually get along with you.
 
the right date makes getting her back home a piece of cake

Watts

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
147
I agree.... this is also something Watts could have focused more on - befriending and establishing rapport with shorty. Could have helped with the logistical situation, but also reduced the potential resistance he encountered. Women are less prone to ASD or FSC when they see that their friends not only accept you, but actually get along with you.

A definitely weakness of mine that is long term is finding the right way to balance attention on a two set. I've done it, essentially "gamed them both" in talking to them both, but in a sense it usually comes down to a lucky break with the other girl becoming engaged with something else so I can reach isolation with my girl.

I even had it happen before that I took my girl to the dancefloor with her friend, and we basically all danced socially while waiting for a guy to dance with her. As soon as it happened, my girl says "I'm glad that happened" and immediately started grinding on me, haha (and this became a SNL). But yeah, that's not consistent.

Finding the way to mentally balance that as a solo nightgamer is another area for improvement.
 

Watts

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
147
I just want to say this Teevster, if anything here seems like I'm challenging your perspective, know that it's just me seeking clarification. I greatly respect and appreciate your input.

When I moved to Paris, I did that. One day of the week end you go to venues you know to get a pull, the other you scout 2-3 venues. Use google maps, map 3 clubs that are near each other and go there.

I like this idea. This place is a block away from where I was Wenesday (where I already have semi-vip status since I know the owner), and I'd like to get a few possible spots.

I think this place could be alright, in particular since it's so large and varied. But definitely worth having a scouting night to find hidden gems.

Make a thread - Top gaygamers - me, Carousel, Maximillian (will post soon)

Thanks for that. And to the point, there are at least two popular gay bars within walking distance too.

The first mistake of the night.

Use the good old "How do you guy know each" from mystery. So much key info to acquire from this.

Back to basics. Should be automatic. Making a note.

Bad kisser usually correlates with ASD. This is because good kissers obviously have more experience, hence less affraid to just jump into it.

Solid insight. Did not connect that. But a good point of information.

Honestly, you jumped from 0 to almost 100 in a second here. From subtle flirting, to her sleeping over can be a big one for her to swallow. I would have escalated the vibe more gradually. A sexual frame would ease this. I am missing a stronger sexual frame in this interaction.

A good point. I took the "Let's go skydiving" as an opportunity to in my mind conveniently move to us sleeping over, which may have been too big a jump.

Also to consider, this was after we had kissed, which was after she planned our future (we would surprise our mutual friend by me coming in and making out with her without announcing we knew each other) essentially a week or more out. Does that change your assessment at all?

And by sexual frame, you mean had I already thrown something out like the purity gambit, that would have edged me closer to the suggestion of her sleeping over?

And from a different perspective, I feel she was more or less accepting (I could be wrong), but she did keep trying to get my agreement here.

One thought might be to go C/F to lower tension (I know not your preference). So another route might be something ridiculous, like she needs to make world class pancakes or I'm kicking her the next day with no skydiving. In other words introduce some other thing to take the pressure off if she felt pressured ("oh I can't make pancakes at all", "psst too bad. NEXT!"), while she could also say she "Makes great pancakes" or (knowing her style, rather coy) that I will have to "wait and see".

And I can also see how this is leading it down a place of releasing tension, and actually setting sexual frames proactively would have just been better.

Too much rapport! rapport = kills the excitement, and can eventually set anti-sexual frames. Really not the way I personally like to do things. here is what you need:
- More spikes (what ever ways you like
- More useful frames. The only frame you got here is "cool, cute guy, whom I have rapport with". It usually won't be enough for a woman, who generally is risk averse to say "yes" to sleep over.

The thrill seeker part was good, but not enough in my book.

Thanks. This is putting something in precise terms I had a vague idea about. I agree.

Going to make a commitment to working in at least one of the useful frames to every isolation, ideally more. That definitely needs to be a habit.

Your point about "cool, cute guy, whom I have rapport with" to her being risk adverse is insightful, I can probably do less work (set less frames) and get further with more sexually adventurous girls because they're already open to fucking the mentioned guy.

And the thrill seeker was a bit reactive, not my plan, just trying to use something she gave me. I need to plan it better and be prepared.

This was a good move, to move her... gradually. I think you should do this more if you can... the more you move her around the better. This is a better form of rapport, because it does not make things boring, but actually connect.

I agree with this. I will say it was my first time in the venue, so I was hesitant to move her (I kind of got lucky with the spot we sat at, I saw it earlier). But to move her to say another room where her friends were not, dance with her in isolation where we could escalate freely, would be another possible move I wasn't thinking about.

My only reaction though is to consider if I start to move her, might that lead her to remember her friends and want to check on them, potentially breaking the bubble? I can think of times when it didn't break actually, in fact an SNL where I did just that, changed venues with a girl from the original to where her friends were, socialized for a bit, and then moved her to the dance floor to escalate, without any of them coming (and that girl was also a dancer).

So possibly move her, we go say hello to the friends, maybe even win over hbshorty a bit, and then we go to a dance floor in one of the other areas by ourselves.

Work talk is not a good way of seducing.... because it triggers anchors... anchors of professionalism and naturally reminds her of work. You really should not do that.

Very solid point. I definitely should minimize it. Probably enough to DHV (I am a decade her senior, so no surprise there), and then move on to more productive topics of seduction.

Good, but building more tension and denying her validation by not kissing her would have been even more powerful.
- Touch her
- Get close to her lips...
- eye contact

And not kiss.. but instead an IOM moment would be better.

So I meant the kiss at the IOM. But yeah, locking hands or something more innocuous (and discrete) while teasing a kiss. I have to try this and see the difference.

However, this is a good spike, good escalation. But escalation, unless if it is getting explicit can only get you as far as this...
You either have... to...
- Get more explicit (and keeping in mind to make her touch you as well - mutual escalation). Now you may not always be "allowed" to get to that point, either because of her compliance level (resistance etc) or the social setting. To handle the first one, sexual frames are the key to up compliance and dissolve resistance. To the second issue: further isolation

It's helpful you mention that. So, another SNL I had which had a similar setup, first girl I talked to in the night, and early, 2 set, actually some early sexualization (she said she just stopped working at her old job because her boss sexually harassed her. I said "If I was your boss I'd sexually harass you too!" lol. A blunt phrasing, to be sure, but it got the point across!), and as it happens a lucky break on the friend (who was also staying with her). Some other group of girls compliments the friend's outfit, and they go off and leave us alone.

But the key moment was when we sat down next to each other, I used a non-judgemental frame (I think, girls should be able to enjoy sex like guys do without being judged), she put her hand on my thigh, and very shortly after I pulled her. Went to my place, fucked, brought her back before her friend knew the difference.

But it was the mutual touching. I need to create that consistently. Get her physically comfortable with me.

- If this is not possible - then you need to work with sexual tension. You must use and abuse this. CREATE THAT POWERFUL bubble.
- Or, keep it verbal all the way, and work with stimulating language and words, and set the frames.

Basically as 60 would say, keep it non-verbal, and don't break the tension, unless you sexualize the verbals (he saw my sex talk as the only legit verbal game - lol)

That makes a lot of sense. And yes, I agree on that being legit verbals because it moves the process forward!

The reason 60 did not like verbal, was because:
- Cocky and funny lines, like witty shit would kill the tension. True, although it can accomplish other things. Not my style anyway so I do not care.

True, and like I said above, it's almost like a save on a sub-par move. Better to just make the superior move.

- And lots of rapport guys use is rapport based, which KILLS the sexual tension. Too much rapport is bad. Only build the necessary minimum of rapport, and leave it at that, and only build more rapport if it is necessary! other wise don't.

This definitely happened. And is a trap I fall into once I have a girl hooked, who clearly likes me. I think I've been using blunt sexualization as a way out of this, but there are clearly better ways.

Another suggestion is to fractionate back and forth between stimulating subjects, and rapport talk.
Stimulation => rapport => stimulation => rapport... and so on... how often you can switch between both is up to you. Quick fractionation is ideal (i.e. switch in short intervals) although finishing a gambit or at least almost finishing it may oftentimes be favored.

Makes a lot of sense. Which is a way to say how I can introduce spikes or sexual frames.

Yes the vibe was not up for it.

100% agree. I think I only mentioned it because as I reflected on the whole interaction I wanted to consider all possible opportunities (in this case, if I had set some sexual frames when I had the chance, and she was ultra receptive).

Here is a fact: You never know how much time you have with a girl. Hence, you must start escalating things quicker - at the first moment of interest. I always assume I am short on time, and do all I can to deliver as much as possible in the less amount of time. Of course I do not go faster than I technically can - you want to stay calibrated - but you always want to push things as fast as you possibly can.

This is an excellent point to keep in mind. I need to be moving forward with much more urgency (without seeming rushed of course).

And here, you absolutely could! I mean she allowed herself to be isolated with you, in addition to seeming receptive. That's a hook my man.

I agree. And with me operating on the level I was that night, I do believe there was a chance if it was just me and her alone with all her friends at the other bar, especially that early in the night, and with the kiss close and body language, there is a decent chance I could have pulled.

However, I would have missed out on some really great lessons that will help me improve.

From what I am reading, you need more PUNCH.

I'm reading that as possibly meaning a few different things. Would you mind expanding on it?

I wouldn't. I would have called "sunk cost". Bad logistics is bad logistics. Move on. But that's a sidenote.

I think the long term best play in that situation is stick hard to staying there, try to keep her there, if she doesn't agree, open a new set. That's the risk, but it's also high reward if she stays.

I also think that here, like on Wenesday, I am sticking in sets to just get back into things. Try to set some frames. Try to move, isolate, escalate. Just get time in set and feel comfortable.

Really not my style - asking for a kiss. You want her to want to kiss you. Kissing is GIVING her validation (all you get is pump up her buyers temperature a bit for a few minutes, and... create a weak IOM - hand-grabbing is better).

I think on some level I'm trying to pump her BT here. I know it's near the end of the night. And maybe I think if I can pump it up and keep it up, she'll agree to have me come home with her.

I also agree with the weakness of the frame "want her to want to" kiss me. I need to be less needy there, and play more with tension and getting her to chase.

I also think I was looking at it as she wants something from me (to know about my not drinking) and I'll use giving her something she wants as a way to start escalating again.

Bad social frame - which can make her feel uncomfortable. Why is he buying me a drink. Here it would have been better if you did not drink, or bought a non-alcoholic drink.

Good point. Better would have been to say "I'm having a water, I need to get hydrated, do you want one too?" and perhaps avoided the not drinking question altogether. Wanting the water after dancing was legitimate, as was it a good excuse to isolate her again, and offering to buy her a drink while I got my water was just basic consideration in this situation. But suggesting water would have been better, you're right, since it would have avoided this.

Not good. It is a bit of a force frame right there. I very rarely get this, especially with a girl who I have spent so much time with, venue changed with.

Agree. And also, with as much compliance and time I had with her, there is no reason it couldn't have become a lay, had I used it better.

I will let you know exactly why this happened, and pay close attention to this:

1. Transition is way too bold. Have some better transitions ready. At best use more thread-cutting (i.e. bridge into topics that get you closer and closer to the subject you actually want to introduce). You introduced some very hardcore sex talk right away. You also forced sexual rapport - have you asked yourself: What have you done to make her feel allowed to open up? Nothing. Which is why I did not go that smootly.

2. You start talking about sex way too late - the later you wait to set a sexual frame, the harder it is, because you will have other frames, such as "rapport" based frames (cool nice guy to talk to) that will stick (due to time passing - which reinforces a frame) and contradict a sexual frame. You are acting so non-sexual for such a while (ok you did escalate and kiss eventually) and now suddently you turn all hyper sexual by asking what type of sex she likes. Cognitive dissonance.

3. You managed to set a sexual frame, but not a good one. Remember you want to set a clear sexual frame, although you want to leave your level of SEXUAL interest in her ambivalent. Preferably, set a sexual frame (and make sure she accept it by for example qualifying to it) BEFORE you start displaying (sexual interest). Here you are clearly displaying interest. Not only did you already kiss her (which was NOT necessary), but you also talk about sex as "you and her". The rule of thumb of sex talk is:

Never communicate that you intend to fuck her, but only that you can, and that you are really god damn good at it, if and only if she is complying to both you and your key frames.

All of these are spot on insights. And I'll have to spend time thinking about each one. Thank you.

In my older reports, I did show some more explicit interest, but I did get more ASD kicks and resistance. Note also that back in the days, I balanced out my display of interest with disqualification and signs of disinterest - basically PUSH and PULL.

Read this.

You did not follow this rule. You should have:
- Opened and hooked
- Moving her around good
- Set the verbal sexual frame

And then kiss her and escalate things.

You did things in the wrong around, and escalating and kissing her, as well as the mistake of showing too much sexual interest by talking about "you and her" in a sexual context, sat some frames that:
- Causes ASD
- kills a bit of tension
- Kills compliance.

And as you mention you got an ASD kick later.

This is something I would have predicted reading this.

Thank you. And it makes sense, why am I escalating if I haven't set the frame for what I'm escalating to? In other words, a mutually passionate, shared expression of pure lust, as opposed to a conquest (a way she might see it negatively).

NO NO NO.

A better response would be:
"Because I find sex to be a fascinating subject! And each person have a different sexual persona, and I am curious about different people's sexual persona! - sex is interesting... and nobody can disagree with that".

Yes, I agree, much better. And much less pressure on her.

Also, I realize I'm relying on my wit to save my brute force escalations, like she said the thing about feet, and I came up with a witty reply about being a boob guy.

In other words I'm just clever enough to say some sexually aggressive shit and then save an otherwise awkward or creepy situation by saying something funny! lol

I mean, that's a pretty funny situation! At least I can laugh at myself there!

Too direct. Yes they get excited... yes! of course! and that's a good.

But it also triggers her anti-slut defense and her female state-control mode

And I forgot to mention, she brought up her dildo's tangentially, I think saying her housemate had seen them, and I talked about using them on her.

She really like that, said no one had ever done that before, and I responded it's all about us giving each other pleasure and making sure we have a great time, so of course I would do it.

Edit: The fact that I was giving her a sexual idea, that she never tried before or perhaps even thought of, but was excited about, may have been some light sexual prizing.

But the point still stands, I was trying to brute force her BT, and with bad logistics at that.

NEVER inquire about her sex life with other men, unless she willingly tells you about it. This question made her uncomfortable. Hence she ignored it.

Good catch.

To me, this is typical female state control (FSC) taking place - caused by you being too direct and triggering her defense mechanism.

You want to boil the frog slowly, else it just jumps out. Her the frog jumped out.

Good analogy, and I agree with boiling it slowly.

However, I'm not sure if this was the FSC that you describe. As I said above, she just got done telling me how excited she was for us to use toys together, and she liked the mutual pleasure frame. Hbshorty came and found us on her own I believe (we had been gone for a while), mostly it seems to complain about creepy guys hitting on her.

My girl actually seemed reluctant at first to go back with the group, I think she was enjoying the conversation. That's not saying it would have lead to where I wanted it to, but I do think she was accepting sex talk with me without having to make further objections.

She did tell me the story of her grabbing her own hair (acted out in detail) to show her housemate she couldn't be rode as effectively anymore.

I think Hbshorty was a wildcard in this situation acting on her own desire, and I didn't effectively get rid of her while my girl was still interested in continuing the conversation (before we went back out, her BT dropped, and her ASD kicked in).

Edit: Also, another thought as I go over this. Had we gotten back to her "fantasy" when she inevitably asks me about mine, I could say "It's not as much as fantasy as just a strong desire. Like I would love to be in a power couple (reconnecting with that otherwise unproductive work stuff, and accounting for the too long spent in rapport making me too safe or perhaps "boyfriend-like" a.k.a. cute, cool guy for slow sex), like we kick ass together in our careers keeping each other motivated, bounce ideas around keeping each other intellectually stimulated, and we fuck like rabbits keeping each other sexually satisfied"

You are totally right.

ASD and FSC taking place.

Was predicted :)

The failure here was not caused by her logistics! But her resisting. She was into you but you overcooked her. She resisted.

It is dead. Resistance all over the place. FSC is more deadly than ASD because ASD is generally communicate as concern. FSC causes 180 degree turns.

Agree completely, and honestly I felt uncomfortable. Like the level of resistance she was putting up made me not want to pursue it further that night, but just leave it on a somewhat good note for another time.

Copying an Edit to the FR, as it's relevent here Edit: One somewhat successful frame I set here, in response to the above was to say I wanted passion in a relationship, that a good relationship always starts with passion, and that I want my women to be passionate. I feel this was helping some, although too little too late.

Typical FSC.

MUST READ:
All the articles listed in the list at the beginning of this article
This article about sex talk.
This report

The only exception I'd say here, is that likely hbshorty saw her friend was uncomfortable, but didn't realize the deeper rapport built between us. I know my girl was willing to talk it out with me. I'm sure she was that hooked.

That is why hbshorty insisted on the "let's go to the bathroom" and even after my girl says "I don't need to go" turns it to "come anyway" and her saying "No". My girl wanted to hear what I had to say.

So I'd say the only disagreement we have is the amount of agreement or coordination between my girl and hbshorty.

But there was definitely a load of FSC or ASD from my girl.

There is more, but this should do for now.

Still hugely informative, thank you.

She is most likely being polite. Women her age usually are. She will most likely flake.

A strong possibility. We've texted back and forth several times over the past several days and she has flat out ignored any attempt of mine to sexualize things while replying to more friendly threads (which, upon reflection in this discussion is NOT what I should be doing. Either I have to commit to getting her to feel good and safe around me again, or give it up. Likely will do the later).

Not a good frame.

Very true. Also my phone is legit messing up going out in this new area and I have to figure out why. So it was the lesser of two evils (being stranded vs. making her uncomfortable).


Gotta at least follow through. Unless I should have pre-emptively flaked myself and just gone back to sleep. If only I knew.

Yes! just like what I am saying... only the necessary amount of rapport.

Yeah, K is a smart dude.

Good:
- Persistance
- Escalation
- The hook
- Isolation

Bad:
- The order - escalating before sex talk (you can escalate WHILE doing sex talk)
- Too much rapport
- Kissing her when it was not necessary (only is when you REALLY need that little short spike)
- Talk about "work"
- Too much sexual intent... "me and you fucking each other" type of frame
- Unsmooth transition.
- Forcing sexual rapport, without:
a) setting a frame that allows her to do it.
b) frame yourself as a sexual guy with high sexual value.

This is a very helpful breakdown, thank you.

Remember.. the key to sex talk is primarily:
- Display sexual prizing
- Reduce resistance.

You may also read my report posted here on GC - the anniversary report.

Thank you, will look into them.

Overall, the issue here was not logistics, but resistance.

That insight alone I feel reorients my focus and gives me a productive direction to push forward in. Thank you again.

Not a bad performance - especially considering the rust. I am focusing more on the mistakes than the good, since it is a priority of fixing them. But there were other good aspects, such as warming up and all that. Good body language analysis too (better than mine lol).

Best,

Thank you. And I appreciate you mentioning the positives too. And for taking the time out for all that!
 
Last edited:

Watts

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
147
- Notice I did not EVER communicate anything that she and I would have sex... I always talked about "what women like", "what I like with women", oftentimes talking about "she" (could be any girl) rather than talking about "her" when discussing sex. Especially when it is explicit. I never show interest that I intend to fuck her, but that I could, if things goes the right way (all while communicating sexual skills, knowledge and good sexual attitude - i.e. sexual prizing). Hence, following the script of the post on how to deliver sex talk I linked to.

I'll say this right off the bat, a long time ago when I was first learning social skills in a formal way (by reading about them as opposed to just normal learning from interacting), I read something that if you want to strike up a conversation with someone, talking about something other than them, say the weather as an extreme non-personal, and then moving closer say like a book they are carrying, and then the even more person would be something about them.

In other word emotional distance from the topic, from how detached they are.

By never making it about her having sex but sex in general, you give her some emotional distance to protect herself, so she doesn't have to activate her ASD/FSC.

I think that is a very valuable insight.

I'll read the report over and respond with more.
 

Watts

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
147
This is a risk you have to be willing to take. Her groups coming in to mess up your set can certainly make the number exchange difficult. However, it can be overcome with a simple, "hey guys can I just say goodbye to her really quick?" - then discreetly take her number down (because your chances of pulling her tonight are over). By getting her number here (which may have been fine a couple years ago before the monogamy stage of your life), you are killing that urgency (which can be crucial for SNLs). She's got your number. what's the rush? She can always just text you to hang out another day. At least that's what she'll tell herself....

I agree. And I'm not 100% sure why I did it, maybe it seemed like a safe move at the time. I think generally I just don't have the killer instinct right now and it's something I need to build back up.

As a side note, an SNL I had, I neither got her number or kissed her until we were already at her friends place. And I didn't even get her number until she drove me back to my car, so I could follow her to her place (where I spent the night), and I said I should get it "In case we got separated."

And I felt the tension all night of not having it too, which I'm sure she did as well.

I may just have to do another round of no number taking.

Also, I do agree that she'll tell herself she'll do it in the future but it won't materialize, no matter how much she likes me, not even a "golden hook" guarantees another meet.

yup. if you are planning on pulling her back to her place. you really want to find out if her roommate (or in this case, her friend that is staying with her) is out with her tonight. Because at the end of the night, when you are both heading to her place. It can create awkwardness. Not to mention if you didn't even bother to game the roommate. If she doesn't like you, she can simply "is he coming home with us"? which can trigger ASD. And then her, not wanting to look like a slut, will change her mind and ask for your number instead. So always make it a point to ask for her roommate in these cases. to know who you have to win over to prevent cockblocking/state breaks. A simple, "is she your roommate?" will do. She can correct you, "no that's my roommate over there" "no my roommate is sleeping" or "I don't have a roommate". So it gives gives you a better idea of what's possible.

Good point, who is the potential late night cockblock? Definitely a worthwhile part of logistics to consider. Thanks for that detail.

lol she didn't really mean it. Just talking about skydiving gave her good emotions. So in that moment she really wanted to do it. The next morning. ehhh not so much. You telling her the following morning, "hey get up silly. we're going skydiving today, remember?" will get you a "huh?" reaction outta her lol.

Yeah, I think just being willing to have this silly, non-logical interaction, is something I was rejecting. As if it was a formal contract. A strange by-product of not going out seriously for a while.

yeah. here if you had known that her pulling back to her place (due to not spending time winning over the friend) or pulling her back to your place (she has to go back to her place because friend) was unlikely, you'd have taken this into account, and switch to a more aggressive sexual game, and play the 'spike her BT through the roof' game to get her to comply for the fast bathroom pull instead.

It certainly wasn't there from how I played it up to that point. But generally I could have done a lot more with the time I had and gotten her both to accept sexual frames (I suppose, feel allowed to be turned on) and turned her on.

It was more me observing this was some time alone in a potential pull spot, not that I think I had it in this seduction.

I'm guessing its because your girl was the only one who had the key to the apartment? and her friend wouldn't be able to get in otherwise.

My thinking at the time was to pull her back to her place and just stay there till the end of the night (ideally) and have her friend take an uber back home alone (which her friend would not have liked I'm sure).

That would have been if we took too much time, but honestly would have been the most pleasant.

The second way would have been to pull her there or to my place, have sex quickly, and then bring her back. If I pulled to my place, I could also have driven back (took uber there), and then picked up her friend and driven them both home.

But I didn't have that concrete a plan, other than roughly that.

Yeah so that ASD shit I talked about earlier was a real objection with this girl. That you needed to have handled. This her not wanting to makeout with you in front of her friends shit (you'll notice that girls who ARE willing to makeout with you in front of their friends don't really have as much ASD as other chicks. And therefore you can get away with taking a girl home without having to set an non-judgemental frame first) should have ring bells in your head that this girl definitely cares about being judged for doing "slutty" shit.

Good observation and insight. And you're right, I should have noted and adjusted.

So taking all this into account, the winning move I see are (After inquiring about logistics):

Win over HBshorty
Set nonjudgemental frame with HBclassy
Go with them back to their place and bang HBclassy in the spare room.

In a nutshell, I agree that was a possible way to go about it, with a higher rate of success than my plan (or lack thereof).

And also, the issue with Hbshorty sharing her bed is honestly a non-issue, with the common room and spare bedroom, and the fact that I don't have to spend the night.

Thanks Velasco! I appreciate your insights and you taking the time to respond!
 

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
1,781
I'll say this right off the bat, a long time ago when I was first learning social skills in a formal way (by reading about them as opposed to just normal learning from interacting), I read something that if you want to strike up a conversation with someone, talking about something other than them, say the weather as an extreme non-personal, and then moving closer say like a book they are carrying, and then the even more person would be something about them.

In other word emotional distance from the topic, from how detached they are.

By never making it about her having sex but sex in general, you give her some emotional distance to protect herself, so she doesn't have to activate her ASD/FSC.

I think that is a very valuable insight.

I'll read the report over and respond with more.

You can talk about her. In fact that's a good thing to do. But do not talk about YOU AND HER. That's the deadly one that triggers resistance. I mean I am of the school of indirect game, and this is our motto. You do not show interest until she does. There are some exceptions to the rule, in general this is the way it is.

Talk about you, talk about her - one allows her to connect, the other allows you to DHV (demonstrate higher value/sexual value - sexual prizing) and convey attrative traits. However one can also talk about OTHER things that is not about you and her, as long as it does something productive to your interaction, whether that is conveying attractive traits, set a frame, stimulate her, or create a connection of some sort. In pick up, we don't fluff for fun, unless fluff has a purpose! This is something you can do after fucking her. Before fucking her, it is all game.

After fucking, that's when you can have fun and "get real".

Best,
 

Watts

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
147
You can talk about her. In fact that's a good thing to do. But do not talk about YOU AND HER. That's the deadly one that triggers resistance. I mean I am of the school of indirect game, and this is our motto. You do not show interest until she does. There are some exceptions to the rule, in general this is the way it is.

Talk about you, talk about her - one allows her to connect, the other allows you to DHV (demonstrate higher value/sexual value - sexual prizing) and convey attrative traits. However one can also talk about OTHER things that is not about you and her, as long as it does something productive to your interaction, whether that is conveying attractive traits, set a frame, stimulate her, or create a connection of some sort. In pick up, we don't fluff for fun, unless fluff has a purpose! This is something you can do after fucking her. Before fucking her, it is all game.

After fucking, that's when you can have fun and "get real".

Best,

This is a good distinction. Thank you for making it.

I can make it personal, just not immediate, until after it happens.

I also appreciate the point that we do not fluff for fun, and that every word and movement has a purpose.

And yes, prior to penis in vagina, it's all game face and tactics, afterwards her and I can be more honest.

In fact, in that thread I linked by Bacchus I talked about a routine around something similar, that moving from strangers to initiates allows us both to be honest, so doesn't it make sense to try to bridge that gap quickly?
 

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
1,781
I just want to say this Teevster, if anything here seems like I'm challenging your perspective, know that it's just me seeking clarification. I greatly respect and appreciate your input.

No worries, but you are welcome to try :)

Thanks for that. And to the point, there are at least two popular gay bars within walking distance too.

I have a long detailed series on dealing with gay-bars on the GC blog. But honestly as long as you are respectful to the gay crowd, and understand you are only a guest, you will be fine. Sure there are some small minor social dynamic aspects that differs from normal venues, but nothing big really.


A good point. I took the "Let's go skydiving" as an opportunity to in my mind conveniently move to us sleeping over, which may have been too big a jump.

Also to consider, this was after we had kissed, which was after she planned our future (we would surprise our mutual friend by me coming in and making out with her without announcing we knew each other) essentially a week or more out. Does that change your assessment at all?

No. Just don't kiss unless you really have to.

Planning a future and future projection is not required unless you see a lack of comfort. Because if it is not needed, you only add more pressure on her ("damn I just met that guy and now suddenly he has plans for the future"). Such things comes FAR later in the interaction, and usually only if she is the kind of girl who is uncomfortable fucking strangers and getting boned (which as we saw later, is truly not the case!)

And by sexual frame, you mean had I already thrown something out like the purity gambit, that would have edged me closer to the suggestion of her sleeping over?

One step at the time. the way it seems you view game is like:

Going from 1 =>100 in a second. Relax. You have to escalate things gradually. and think of the steps between 1 and 100... like 1=>2 ... => 100. You need to break this all down to smaller steps. Extraction is not, by this time a question. First establish that sexual frame and deal with potential resistance, then community a sexual persona and talk about sex and amp her up... then escalate the vibe... AND THEN we talk about extraction.

Follow this mindset of always asking you what is the "NEXT IMMEDIATE STEP"... not "WHAT IS THE FINAL STEP". One thing at the time. If you do not fix the steps in between you will face:
- Resistance
- Rejection
- At best you get shaky pulls
- Occasionally you get lucky.

But to answer your question, yes such frame would have eased things up, but not guaranteed the pull.
And from a different perspective, I feel she was more or less accepting (I could be wrong), but she did keep trying to get my agreement here.

One thought might be to go C/F to lower tension (I know not your preference). So another route might be something ridiculous, like she needs to make world class pancakes or I'm kicking her the next day with no skydiving. In other words introduce some other thing to take the pressure off if she felt pressured ("oh I can't make pancakes at all", "psst too bad. NEXT!"), while she could also say she "Makes great pancakes" or (knowing her style, rather coy) that I will have to "wait and see".

No, what you needed to do is not add cocky funny but to stop using material that increases resistance, and that is not necessary for your pull. Cut this "both you two skydiving" shit out. Stop the future projection and stop communicating "you and me into each other" stuff. It only causes FSC and ASD. If a girl came up to you and started talking about skydiving and shit you'd might get a bit crept out wouldn't you? I would find it weird to be honest.

Again this serves almost 0 purpose here, and only causes negative side effects. Future projection is a thing you only use as a response to a certain form of resistance (for example when a girl is resisting you because she thinks you are a player and she is just yet another girl - this was not the case here)

And I can also see how this is leading it down a place of releasing tension, and actually setting sexual frames proactively would have just been better.

Here is a list of better things you could have done (based on different style):
- Push and pull and teasing (C/F)
- Talk about sex as an interesting subject - use any of my gambits or anything similar. Here are 3 super simple gambits.
- Talk about emotionally loaded subjects and deliver Milton patterns like Bacchus
- Dance and use push and pull escalation.
- DHV's - not my style but would have been better - a crazy story about you in the vip area.... for example...

That's pick up.
That's how it works.

You want to communicate that you want to have casual sex. How does "going skydiving and eating pancakes the next day" make it casual? It adds more meaning to it, which can make women uncomfortable - it adds pressure.

Your point about "cool, cute guy, whom I have rapport with" to her being risk adverse is insightful, I can probably do less work (set less frames) and get further with more sexually adventurous girls because they're already open to fucking the mentioned guy.

It is not about setting less frames - it is about setting the right frames. "cool cute guy whom I have rapport with" is not a useful frame. An "intriguing, interesting guy with tons of sexual experience" is.... (just an example), or "a guy who is chill, laidback and non-judgemental when it comes to sex" is too.. or "guy who understand my needs and situation" is as well...

Just giving examples... but you can have others.

"guy with high social value"
"guy who every other girl wants"

Those are useful frames.

And the thrill seeker was a bit reactive, not my plan, just trying to use something she gave me. I need to plan it better and be prepared.

"thrill seeker" is a good frame and a good theme. Ask her about what she finds thrilling and exciting, than share a story about a thrill seeking experience of your... and make her share one of hers... and discuss different things are thrillseeking...

That's good game.
- Sets a good frame
- Stimulates her
- Create the right form of rapport.


I agree with this. I will say it was my first time in the venue, so I was hesitant to move her (I kind of got lucky with the spot we sat at, I saw it earlier). But to move her to say another room where her friends were not, dance with her in isolation where we could escalate freely, would be another possible move I wasn't thinking about.

PS: Even moving her 3 meters away is considered moving.

My only reaction though is to consider if I start to move her, might that lead her to remember her friends and want to check on them, potentially breaking the bubble? I can think of times when it didn't break actually, in fact an SNL where I did just that, changed venues with a girl from the original to where her friends were, socialized for a bit, and then moved her to the dance floor to escalate, without any of them coming (and that girl was also a dancer).

Maybe, maybe not. But she won't necessarily start thinking of her friend if you move her 3 meters away, then 2 other meters... etc.

Remember also that if YOU are the one BREAKING the tension, you are still in control of rebuilding it. It is much more dangerous when other burst the bubble.

When you break the tension in a controlled way, it becomes FRACTIONATION, and not necessarily a bad thing.

So possibly move her, we go say hello to the friends, maybe even win over hbshorty a bit, and then we go to a dance floor in one of the other areas by ourselves.

Sure, why not. As long as you break the tension, you are in control.
Here you get to:
- Fractionate
- Befriend her friend (good for logistics and social frame)
- And move her..

Small move, lots of benefits.


Very solid point. I definitely should minimize it. Probably enough to DHV (I am a decade her senior, so no surprise there), and then move on to more productive topics of seduction.

Sure, why not.

So I meant the kiss at the IOM. But yeah, locking hands or something more innocuous (and discrete) while teasing a kiss. I have to try this and see the difference.

Sure, it is more discrete, but that is not the reason for why you should not kiss. As Mentioned earlier: kissing validates her and kill the sexual tension - it is too much of a tension release.

Kissing = sexual tension release, potential ASD and cockblocking from friends, and validating her too much (i.e. you loose compliance, since she won't be seeking your validation, since you already closed that loop). All you get in return from it, is a short and small BT spike and... an IOM (that you can get without kissing, but hand holding, sexual qualification, normal qualification or mutual touching).


It's helpful you mention that. So, another SNL I had which had a similar setup, first girl I talked to in the night, and early, 2 set, actually some early sexualization (she said she just stopped working at her old job because her boss sexually harassed her. I said "If I was your boss I'd sexually harass you too!" lol.

Oh gosh... why elicit negative emotions? why trigger a potential negative anchor?

Instead you could talk about how most men are desperate and that they do not understand that women are sexual beings, ONLY if they feel allowed to be sexual with that man.

Doing things like this you show you understand her (pacing), now you make her feel comfortable, and now you come off as socially savy and not like every other guy! Now you communicate that you are (sexually) experienced and not needy.

You see.. that's beneficial.

Can the things you just said work? sure everything can work. But it can also fuck things up a lot.

Additionally.. AGAIN too much sexual intent. Too much "I want to fuck you" frame. I have told you 4 times now that you should not do this! At least not until you reach some SERIOUS compliance with her (and have managed to set strong sexual frames) and EVEN then, I personally wouldn't do it (more a matter of style - I tend to stay on the smooth and risk-averse side).

A blunt phrasing, to be sure, but it got the point across!), and as it happens a lucky break on the friend (who was also staying with her). Some other group of girls compliments the friend's outfit, and they go off and leave us alone.

Lucky break.

But the key moment was when we sat down next to each other, I used a non-judgemental frame (I think, girls should be able to enjoy sex like guys do without being judged), she put her hand on my thigh, and very shortly after I pulled her. Went to my place, fucked, brought her back before her friend knew the difference.

See? that's good game. Do you see the correlation here?

It was that thing that got you the pull.

But it was the mutual touching. I need to create that consistently. Get her physically comfortable with me.

And this... also helped you get the pull.

See when you do things right, you get the pull!


I'm reading that as possibly meaning a few different things. Would you mind expanding on it?

Anything that can:
- Stimulate her (without communicating intent: i.e. you wanting to fuck her)
- Set exciting and good frames (includes frames that could help you dodge potential resistance)
- Things that escalate the interaction, gradually.

There is more but those are the crucial aspects.

I think the long term best play in that situation is stick hard to staying there, try to keep her there, if she doesn't agree, open a new set. That's the risk, but it's also high reward if she stays.

I also think that here, like on Wenesday, I am sticking in sets to just get back into things. Try to set some frames. Try to move, isolate, escalate. Just get time in set and feel comfortable.

Sure staying vs leaving is a calculus you have to make - cost-benefits.

I think on some level I'm trying to pump her BT here. I know it's near the end of the night. And maybe I think if I can pump it up and keep it up, she'll agree to have me come home with her.

Pumping the BT is a good plan in that situation.

If you want to get advanced about it, only do it when you have the chance the isolate or extract. Otherwise the BT will fade and her mood will be "meh". See buyers temperature goes up and down and is not sustainable. Frames on the other hand are sustainable. They mostly stick, even if she experiences a state drop.

But "end of the night" is a good time to spike her BT.
But what is the point of spiking her BT, if at the same time you up her resistance drastically like in your case?
Again... resistance will grow proportionally to her BT because you have:
a) Not enough sexual frames that could help you fight resistance (i.e. non-judgemental frames)
b) As Velasco pointed out - not enough rapport with her friend (lack of social frame).
c) Displaying too much sexual intent/sexual interest


I also agree with the weakness of the frame "want her to want to" kiss me. I need to be less needy there, and play more with tension and getting her to chase.

It is a terrible frame on every level. You will understand why when you read up on Prizability (Swinggcat)

I also think I was looking at it as she wants something from me (to know about my not drinking) and I'll use giving her something she wants as a way to start escalating again.

Meh.

Good point. Better would have been to say "I'm having a water, I need to get hydrated, do you want one too?" and perhaps avoided the not drinking question altogether. Wanting the water after dancing was legitimate, as was it a good excuse to isolate her again, and offering to buy her a drink while I got my water was just basic consideration in this situation. But suggesting water would have been better, you're right, since it would have avoided this.

Very good one right there!

Agree. And also, with as much compliance and time I had with her, there is no reason it couldn't have become a lay, had I used it better.

You had the hook. That's for sure. You had good initial compliance. With the right frames, and more sexual tension (i.e. not kissing or displaying too much sexual interest, but being more ambiguous) as well as not increasing her resistance (i.e. related to "showing sexual intend - that's you want to fuck her") and perhaps also befriending her friend more... I am sure you could have pulled her.

Not saying you would have, because in real life other factors ma come into play, but on paper you would (and oftentimes, the correct "on paper" actually works in field)

Thank you. And it makes sense, why am I escalating if I haven't set the frame for what I'm escalating to? In other words, a mutually passionate, shared expression of pure lust, as opposed to a conquest (a way she might see it negatively).

I did not really think of it that way, but I like this frame a lot! Thanks.

Also, I realize I'm relying on my wit to save my brute force escalations, like she said the thing about feet, and I came up with a witty reply about being a boob guy.

That moves was ok actually. Although not my favorite one.

I would have answered "he has the right to enjoy feet, I mean afterall there are quite a few nerves down there... but hey not my thing really"
And follow up with "and even though it is not my thing, we need to respect that other people may be into it... however we also have the right to say no to participate into those acts - that's what I would refer to as sexual freedom".

Can you see how many things I am able to convey in those simple sentence?
- Non- judgemental
- Respectful
- Accepting one's limits (sexual comfort)
- Yet also sexually open-minded.
- While maintaining a sexual frame.

In other words I'm just clever enough to say some sexually aggressive shit and then save an otherwise awkward or creepy situation by saying something funny! lol

That is not my style, but it can work (reminds me of the good old GM style. High risk/high reward though (Chase has a great article on this on the GC blog).

And I forgot to mention, she brought up her dildo's tangentially, I think saying her housemate had seen them, and I talked about using them on her.

She must have been quite into you, to not burst into major resistance mode after all this.

Again you see the mistake here?

She really like that, said no one had ever done that before, and I responded it's all about us giving each other pleasure and making sure we have a great time, so of course I would do it.

Again, as mentioned earlier - those direct lines can STIMULATE WOMEN. In fact they do. However, at the same time it ups her resistance - ESPECIALLY when the stimulation (BT) fades or crashes.

Edit: The fact that I was giving her a sexual idea, that she never tried before or perhaps even thought of, but was excited about, may have been some light sexual prizing.

Yes! however you paid a heavy price for it - i.e. set some other bad frames (again communicating sexual intent - i.e. that you plan doing X sexual thing with her).

Let me give you an example of how I would do it.

Me: Ah interesting! Huum I used to know a girl called Julie.... Julie is a smart, beautiful, but best of all, a very proud and sexual woman! She would express her sexuality without fear - and god that was sexy (notice the powerful frame) and she would have a bunch of toys, because after all most men are unable to please women (notice another frame here). However, once she met guys who would fuck her silly... she would bring those toys, and realize that they could add to her pleasures.
Her: what ever
Me: I remember her liking (implying you fucked her, and implying you were one of those guys who would fuck her silly) using that vibrator while getting fucked and she also enjoyed being dildoed while licked. Was times she enjoyed having anal beads while being fuck vaginally. Again, she was a true sexual lady.

Notice all the frame! Notice how I sexual prize myself heavily here.

Try to discern it all.

But the point still stands, I was trying to brute force her BT, and with bad logistics at that.

Yeah. Hit or miss. direct is hit of miss. Now if you do want to play it direct... (which is not my style), you either need to do:
- Heavier screening
- Shorter interactions - make it work fast, or get the fuck out, so that you can move to the next one.

You are welcome to do this... but that's not my thing.

And you did not do any heavy screening here (else you would not have gone for a two set, and you would have left when logistics turned out to be not optimal - you would probably also screen for women who were almost DTF from the get go.
You also had a long interaction.

So the whole thing was not suited for direct game.
But hey I am not expert here.

However, I'm not sure if this was the FSC that you describe. As I said above, she just got done telling me how excited she was for us to use toys together, and she liked the mutual pleasure frame. Hbshorty came and found us on her own I believe (we had been gone for a while), mostly it seems to complain about creepy guys hitting on her.

FSC is not her not liking what you are saying. FSC is in fact her liking what you are saying, and getting stimulated by it... and then become conscious about it and controlling herself.

I am not sure if you understood the concept properly.

My girl actually seemed reluctant at first to go back with the group, I think she was enjoying the conversation. That's not saying it would have lead to where I wanted it to, but I do think she was accepting sex talk with me without having to make further objections.

She was because as I mentioned you had a lot of early compliance with her and the conversation itself is stimulating. But the moment her state dropped a bit and BT was gone all that remained were the frames, that in this case were working again you. AGAIN read the articles I posted in my first response. They answer this. Especially this one, and the linked articles listed in the beginning of it.


I think Hbshorty was a wildcard in this situation acting on her own desire, and I didn't effectively get rid of her while my girl was still interested in continuing the conversation (before we went back out, her BT dropped, and her ASD kicked in).

Edit: Also, another thought as I go over this. Had we gotten back to her "fantasy" when she inevitably asks me about mine, I could say "It's not as much as fantasy as just a strong desire. Like I would love to be in a power couple (reconnecting with that otherwise unproductive work stuff, and accounting for the too long spent in rapport making me too safe or perhaps "boyfriend-like" a.k.a. cute, cool guy for slow sex), like we kick ass together in our careers keeping each other motivated, bounce ideas around keeping each other intellectually stimulated, and we fuck like rabbits keeping each other sexually satisfied"

"we kick ass together"
"we fuck like rabbits"

Again, see the mistake here?

Agree completely, and honestly I felt uncomfortable. Like the level of resistance she was putting up made me not want to pursue it further that night, but just leave it on a somewhat good note for another time.

Copying an Edit to the FR, as it's relevent here
Edit: One somewhat successful frame I set here, in response to the above was to say I wanted passion in a relationship, that a good relationship always starts with passion, and that I want my women to be passionate. I feel this was helping some, although too little too late.[/QUOTE]

A guy who starts talking about relationship before fucking is usually a needy guy. It only puts too much pressure on her. Do not do that! It is her job to bring relationships up (after you have fucked her), not you.

You are a stranger... who barely kissed her after just meeting her... and happen to already talk about relationship? He defense mechanism will be activated that's for sure.

I mean all these things adds up to the end-result. Shockingly you got away with that much - it proves she was actually really into you (high baseline attraction). I must mention that also the stimulation you provided also did help (although it also contributed to your downfall).

The only exception I'd say here, is that likely hbshorty saw her friend was uncomfortable, but didn't realize the deeper rapport built between us. I know my girl was willing to talk it out with me. I'm sure she was that hooked.

Nope, and you cannot expect her to know about it either. She saw her friend being uncomfortable... that was the cardinal mistake. I have already discussed why she got uncomfortable and won't repeat myself.

That is why hbshorty insisted on the "let's go to the bathroom" and even after my girl says "I don't need to go" turns it to "come anyway" and her saying "No". My girl wanted to hear what I had to say.

If you have read my articles on FSC you would know that this is the most normal way FSC is displayed in real life - her friends dragging her to the bathroom. From this article on FSC:

"Therefore, when women get aroused too quickly, they will go to the bathroom. Some even claim that in addition to being a place to piss and gossip, bathrooms in clubs are an area for FSC.


Also, if her friends know or assume you are not her type or not a good fit for her, they will cockblock to reduce your girl’s state so that she can go back to making a rational and conscious evaluation about you. And so other women will cockblock because they see that their friend is getting carried away and THEY KNOW she will act irrationally. Interesting right?"


Again, read all the posts on FSC.

A strong possibility. We've texted back and forth several times over the past several days and she has flat out ignored any attempt of mine to sexualize things while replying to more friendly threads (which, upon reflection in this discussion is NOT what I should be doing. Either I have to commit to getting her to feel good and safe around me again, or give it up. Likely will do the later).

I wonder why....

Very true. Also my phone is legit messing up going out in this new area and I have to figure out why. So it was the lesser of two evils (being stranded vs. making her uncomfortable).

Get a new phone. Logistics man...

I hope this clarified things further

Best,
 
Last edited:

Watts

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
147
Just to respond to this quickly:

Planning a future and future projection is not required unless you see a lack of comfort. Because if it is not needed, you only add more pressure on her ("damn I just met that guy and now suddenly he has plans for the future"). Such things comes FAR later in the interaction, and usually only if she is the kind of girl who is uncomfortable fucking strangers and getting boned (which as we saw later, is truly not the case!)

Cut this "both you two skydiving" shit out. Stop the future projection and stop communicating "you and me into each other" stuff. It only causes FSC and ASD. If a girl came up to you and started talking about skydiving and shit you'd might get a bit crept out wouldn't you? I would find it weird to be honest.

Again this serves almost 0 purpose here, and only causes negative side effects. Future projection is a thing you only use as a response to a certain form of resistance (for example when a girl is resisting you because she thinks you are a player and she is just yet another girl - this was not the case here)

There may be a bit of confusion here. It was her who kept persisting and wanting me to agree to sky diving. Also, she wanted to have a big (relationship) reveal where I swooped in and made out with her in front of our mutual friend (without telling them we knew each other beforehand).

And I mentioned this, that she was future projecting our relationship, as (potential) evidence that I could escalate.

But we agree here, that future projecting by me can have many negative consequences.
 

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
1,781
There may be a bit of confusion here. It was her who kept persisting and wanting me to agree to sky diving. Also, she wanted to have a big (relationship) reveal where I swooped in and made out with her in front of our mutual friend (without telling them we knew each other beforehand).

Ok my bad. However...

Since when do we follow women's frame?

Since Never.

We pace their frame... and then once paced, we lead them (onto one of our frames). That's how the game is played.

And I mentioned this, that she was future projecting our relationship, as (potential) evidence that I could escalate.

She threw the shitty frame out there, and you took the bait.

How is this future projection leading you to your goal? It is simply not.

Although, you following her frame, will not creep her out (since she is the one engaging in it). however the frame set is not useful - it sets a BF/GF frame that may counteract the pure sexual frame (as you as a lover).

Again, you are the one leading the interaction, not her.

Best,
 

Watts

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
147
Ok my bad. However...

Since when do we follow women's frame?

Since Never.

We pace their frame... and then once paced, we lead them (onto one of our frames). That's how the game is played.

Solid points. It should only serve as a baseline for me to estimate her attraction and compliance. Then I should run my game.

She threw the shitty frame out there, and you took the bait.

How is this future projection leading you to your goal? It is simply not.

Although, you following her frame, will not creep her out (since she is the one engaging in it). however the frame set is not useful - it sets a BF/GF frame that may counteract the pure sexual frame (as you as a lover).

Again, you are the one leading the interaction, not her.

Best,

Very well put. And agreeing to the BF/GF frame she sets is playing it safe to not lose the set that night, but ultimately without succeeding as a lover, there's more of a chance we never get together at all.

So maybe the lover frame is the real "play it safe" because the BF/GF slow path, get in line for an interview is both a lower chance of success and a hug time sink.

Setting some early sexual frames next time will be a good push in the right direction.
 

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
1,781
Solid points. It should only serve as a baseline for me to estimate her attraction and compliance. Then I should run my game.


In some cases yes, but sometimes owmen can set shitty frames without being attracted to you (happens quite often). Her shitty frame is a starting point to which you have to work from. By this, I do not mean "accepting and reinforcing it" but gradually get aay from it and set a new frame (one of your desire). This is what we call "reframing". All this falls under "frame-control".

Very well put. And agreeing to the BF/GF frame she sets is playing it safe to not lose the set that night, but ultimately without succeeding as a lover, there's more of a chance we never get together at all.

It sets and reinforces a frame that works against you (if your plan is to just pull her). Having the BF/GF frames will make her display purity and act a-sexual in order to seem more desirable to you as a GF (why this is a a whole different discussion - but generally, men seek "purity" when looking for a girlfriend, and women aware of that, act upon it). This works against you (this is also why women put on resistance and have a higher chance to give you LMR when she perceives you as a potential BF (i.e. when you have a "GF/BF frame" going between you two).

So maybe the lover frame is the real "play it safe" because the BF/GF slow path, get in line for an interview is both a lower chance of success and a hug time sink.

It is the frame that has the best odds to get you ONS' with less resistance.

Setting some early sexual frames next time will be a good push in the right direction.

YES! but remember to remain ambiguous about your level of interest - at least at first. Then once you feel she has accepted the frames and showed you interest (i.e. compliance) you may show interest back, but NEVER EVER in the form of "I want to fuck you" or "me and you have wild sex". The way you do it, as I have explained earlier is through:
- Qualification "I like the fact that you are so liberated girl" or "your views on sex are intriguing".
- Physical escalation (yet always nice to maintain SOME tension).

The last option is the most common and textbook one. Also probably the most intuitive one.

Best,
 

Watts

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
147
Not if it's counter-productive to putting your penis in her vagina.

Trying to bridge the gap towards that kind of honesty. . . before you have sex with her. . . can throw the unfolding seduction into knee-jerk "No I'm not a slut I can't do this" territory. Overt statements of interest as well as verbalized sexual intent give your interactions a "I'm hitting on you. Do you accept?" vibe. Those things aren't great for social-frame because women simply don't want to feel accountable for sex.

I think this connects to a bit of what Teevster was saying that I shouldn't be explicit about something between me and her.

But, using a routine like that where I talk about intimacy in a more abstract sense, and let her make that connection (either in her own head or let her move to "you're right, it's better to get that first time out of the way!" (I had a variant of that before) ).

It's an important distinction, thank you.

I'm also organizing all the feedback I received both here and through various conversations (Mostly longer exchanges with Teevster, but also between us too and with others), and putting it down as top level mental models to work on (as well as an overall tactical plan). This inspired:

Avoid Making Her Responsible For Sex With "I"m hitting on you, do you accept?" Frame

Now you've already gotten excellent advice here from Teevster and Velasco. I'll just stress the importance of being mysterious about your interest levels during a seduction. This makes her feel like she's chasing you instead of the other way around. Especially if you're going to use arousal pumping techniques. Because continuing to get her hot and bothered without tight social-frame often triggers FSC. . .

Good distinctions, updated:

Match Her Interest Level At Most, Fractionate To Create Mystery - Teevster pointed out not going above her interest level, but also frationating and push/pull, so that is a practical way I can maintain ambiguity.

Establish Social Frame Before You Escalate, Remember To Maintain - This is to remind me to come back and make good with the friend. I didn't emphasize here that I definitely initially made a good impression, and later bought a shot for her with my girl before we venue changed, as well as paying for a small pizza (which is a crude way of handling it). And the three of us walked over to new venue together and talked and joked.

But I didn't have it strongly in my mind that I needed the friend to like me, nor did I have an efficient plan of doing what was needed to maintain the good social frame, in particular with this girl staying with her, to not have that bite me later. Also, I wasn't keeping it in mind when dancing with her in front of her friends, which I do know to do, but wasn't paying it the proper attention (I'll attribute that to rust).
 
Top