Forum News Generative AI Is Not a Seducer: Let’s Keep It That Way (The Forum’s Official Position)

[Skills]

Exactly. See how I don’t need to do online as a requirement to already know this.

Brah my point is you have not field tested to formulate an opinion... "I don't need" is not field tested...i look at trailer I can see it could work but i would be kj just like you are since we have not field tested... Community based on field testing not opinions

 

[Teevster]

Again i will give you a sample post of many were i used Western dictionary to look for a definition to make a point...

The fallacy of seduction success part 3 - What is optimal??

First definition: "best; most likely to bring success or advantage: Several treatment sessions are required in order to obtain optimal results. Conditions in the chamber are optimal for diffusion, reaching very high temperatures. Synonym the best or most effective possible in a particular...

www.skilledseducer.com

If the definition of optimial i like and took From ai who cares, if is to make my own points based on field experience.... However if the ai is used to generate content of course that's a problem... If ai is designed for an online expert lets say pwf and is used by a guy to get laid or for pics, who cares... There were to my knowledge in the forum 1 poster that was posting content ai he got banned right away...

Seems like you are the only one around here wo is ok with gen AI content on the forum. Most of us are not. Secondly, as mentioned in my OP you cannot, with integrity copy paste, either from ChatGPT or a dictionary without citing the source. Anything else is technically plagiarism. Furthermore, the problem is that even though you may be in a in a position to judge what AI generated content is and is not legit, many newer guys are not. Thus we cannot and should not set a precedence for AI. And lastly, even if the material generated by an is correct, it still sucks - most readers do not enjoy reading generated content.

Forum integrity and quality comes first.

-Teevster

 

[Skills]

Seems like you are the only one around here wo is ok with gen AI content on the forum. Most of us are not. Secondly, as mentioned in my OP you cannot, in integrity copy paste, either from ChatGPT or a dictionar without citing the source. Anything else is technically plagiarism. Furthermore, the problem is that you are a in a position to judge what AI generated content is, and is not legit. Many newer guys are not. Thus we cannot and should not set a precedence. And lastly, even if the material is correct, it still sucks - most do not enjoy reading generated content.

Forum integrity and quality comes first.

-Teevster

Seems you don't understand my point and the issue, did you see how in the sample post i used the Western dictionary and put on quotes... This is a lot to do about nothing but hey i will follow whatever clear rules are posted... I also quote you to make points and others... You had the same outrage for years with online.... But anyways this a lot to do about nothing, but as you say my opinion...

 

[Teevster]

Brah my point is you have not field tested to formulate an opinion... "I don't need" is not field tested...i look at trailer I can see it could work but i would be kj just like you are since we have not field tested... Community based on field testing not opinions

Ok let us for the sake of the argument believe this works. That would give some men a quick fix, but never really teach them true game, the underlying principles, the dynamic, etc. Also, chances are, that there is too much of a dissonance between that AI persona over text and IRL. You see where I am going with this.

And I have experimented with most AI apps out there for different purposes - from research to art. It is beneficial, but one should use them with caution and see them for they are.

Don't fall for the hype. Trust me, I know my AI stuff as well as pick up almost. I know how (generative) AIs work, and how their built.

-Teevster

 

[Teevster]

Seems you don't understand my point and the issue, did you see how in the sample post i used the Western dictionary and put on quotes... This is a lot to do about nothing but hey i will follow whatever clear rules are posted... I also quote you to make points and others... You had the same outrage for years with online.... But anyways this a lot to do about nothing, but as you say my opinion...

Part of the guidelines for generative will be: "AI-Generated content will have to be put in quotes" followed with a clear statement that the quoted text is from e.g. Copilot/ChatGPT. However, the suggestion is that this should only be done seldomly, and with a plausible reason".

Quoting dictionary is ok though. Can be done any time.

-Teevster

 

[Teevster]

You had the same outrage for years with online.... But anyways this a lot to do about nothing, but as you say my opinion...

And online still kinda sucks? It made the youth into social retards, hampered tons of men in their success with women, gave some semi-naturals some freebies, especially if they had a good profile (pictures especially), and living in a place where Bumble/Tinder hooks was popularized in the common populace, during an era where normal girls used it for fun - before it got invaded by single mums, psychos, picky 7s, fatties, hot prostitutes, influencers looking for instagram followers, and... of course the horny trannies.

-Teevster

 

[Skills]

Part of the guidelines for generative will be: "AI-Generated content will have to be put in quotes" followed with a clear statement that the quoted text is from e.g. Copilot/ChatGPT. However, the suggestion is that this should only be done seldomly, and with a plausible reason".

Quoting dictionary is ok though. Can be done any time.

-Teevster

Yes this is my point ok... so we are on the same page

 

[Skills]

And online still kinda sucks? It made the youth into social retards, hampered tons of men in their success with women, gave some semi-naturals some freebies, especially if they had a good profile (pictures especially), and living in a place where Bumble/Tinder hooks was popularized in the common populace, during an era where normal girls used it for fun - before it got invaded by single mums, psychos, picky 7s, fatties, hot prostitutes, influencers looking for instagram followers, and... of course the horny trannies.

-Teevster

Agree lol...

 

[Teevster]

Yes this is my point ok... so we are on the same page

Good. However, emphasis on the word seldomly and with plausible cause. Too much of it may give the readers the wrong impression and may put them off. Also another thing @Chase mentioned to me privately is that generative AI content tend to not only dissuade readers, but also affects online search engine ranking of the forums. Not in our interest.

Edit: we have been reflecting over this for over a week. Our position does not come out of nowhere.

-Teevster

 

[Skills]

Good. However, emphasis on the word seldomly and with plausible cause. Too much of it may give the readers the wrong impression and may put them off. Also another thing @Chase mentioned to me privately is that generative AI content tend to not only dissuade readers, but also affects online search engine ranking of the forums. Not in our interest.

Edit: we have been reflecting over this for over a week. Our position does not come out of nowhere.

-Teevster

Oh now isee got it.. ok i will just use pua lingo or kjfrancis lol..

 

[Teevster]

Agree lol...

So imagine now, dating apps being used by men, who use generative AI to "text game" fatties, psycho 7s, trannies and prostitutes. Yeah, I want no part in that

Call me conservative.

-Teevster