- Joined
- Sep 11, 2023
- Messages
- 135
So, I'm pretty good with women. My body count is... I'm not sure. I lost count long ago. It's certainly over 150 though.
Maybe I'm a natural, maybe I am tall, maybe I have a high verbal intelligence, maybe I'm funny. I dunno! But I'm here because I have a few Achilles' Heels that I need to work on; for example, I fall in love / get torn up over a single girl very easily. Women can make me a wreck.
Anyway, this place seems great. It's much better than other online dating/seduction spaces, which seem to be full of losers who try to shore up their lack of positive qualities with mechanical and overly analytical "game" that they think rehearsing hard enough will save them
The best wisdom boils down to:
So... all of this seems natural and even obvious to me, barring my obsessive romantic tendencies.
But this brings me: is PUA stuff just neuroticism? Does it put men in a weird, artificial mindset where they are taken out of the moment and into their heads to do buffoonish math problems?
The neurotic shit.
This board seems to be the best on the internet, but I even see the neuroticism here sometimes. Do you boys think this delegitimizes the concept of game? Or is "game" a fake-it-till-you-make-it scenario, where you ape the natural tendencies of strong men through conscious calculation until they become real?
EDIT: Mark Manson often has an antidote to the clownish excesses of "game" thinking. This article, for example, counters the "GRR I HAVE TO BE A BIG MANLY MAN ALPHA MALE WITH NO VULNERABILITY TO KEEP A WOMAN" buffoon-LARP mindset
Maybe I'm a natural, maybe I am tall, maybe I have a high verbal intelligence, maybe I'm funny. I dunno! But I'm here because I have a few Achilles' Heels that I need to work on; for example, I fall in love / get torn up over a single girl very easily. Women can make me a wreck.
Anyway, this place seems great. It's much better than other online dating/seduction spaces, which seem to be full of losers who try to shore up their lack of positive qualities with mechanical and overly analytical "game" that they think rehearsing hard enough will save them
The best wisdom boils down to:
- Have passion/goals in your life that don't involve getting women
- Stop being outcome dependent in interactions
- be positive and focus on having a good time, since this is magnetic
- Don't desexualize yourself. Let your sexuality take wing and draw her in. Don't be scared.
- Have lots of options (abundance)
- never be needy
- Move as fast as the situation allows
- Use physical touch
- be funny, use humor, be playful
- Stop giving a fuck about what women think and let your quirks take wing
- show interest in women
- Look good and have an interesting style that would appeal to your "type"
So... all of this seems natural and even obvious to me, barring my obsessive romantic tendencies.
But this brings me: is PUA stuff just neuroticism? Does it put men in a weird, artificial mindset where they are taken out of the moment and into their heads to do buffoonish math problems?
The neurotic shit.
- Obsessing over the minutiae of your gait, posture, voice, facial expression, and how to engineer it.
- Calculating how many minutes you should take to text her back.
- Bro science about "lovers vs boyfriends"
- Dress like a club-loser who walked out of a Miami Zara in 2011.
- retardation like "neuro-linguistic programming" but thankfully that seems to not be spoken about much anymore.
This board seems to be the best on the internet, but I even see the neuroticism here sometimes. Do you boys think this delegitimizes the concept of game? Or is "game" a fake-it-till-you-make-it scenario, where you ape the natural tendencies of strong men through conscious calculation until they become real?
EDIT: Mark Manson often has an antidote to the clownish excesses of "game" thinking. This article, for example, counters the "GRR I HAVE TO BE A BIG MANLY MAN ALPHA MALE WITH NO VULNERABILITY TO KEEP A WOMAN" buffoon-LARP mindset
Last edited: