I was talking about removing nuance in what I'm saying, erasing it, and make it seem like I'm the one saying extreme stuff.
You also projected weird stuff on me, like the part where you accused me of "only saying that because you do social circle game". This is again twisting things I said in a completely different thread and discussion.
1) Over there I specifically said it only in the context of me approaching a ton of (high volume of) younger chicks on the streets where I live (typically chicks 20 years younger). No way I'm doing direct at this age gap, where I live, especially at volume, that's Hella uncalibrated.
2) If I see a hot MILF, you bet I'm going direct
3) And as ALSO stated in that other thread (which you're pulling from and misrepresenting) I'd sexualize the second I see even a glimpse of her being open to it, even if she is younger, but no way I'm leading with that.
So you agree with the particular nuance (combining locations if you're gonna do high-volume), but WHEN I SAY it, well it's "you're only saying it because you're the social circle guy".
You also projected weird stuff on me, like the part where you accused me of "only saying that because you do social circle game". This is again twisting things I said in a completely different thread and discussion.
1) Over there I specifically said it only in the context of me approaching a ton of (high volume of) younger chicks on the streets where I live (typically chicks 20 years younger). No way I'm doing direct at this age gap, where I live, especially at volume, that's Hella uncalibrated.
2) If I see a hot MILF, you bet I'm going direct
3) And as ALSO stated in that other thread (which you're pulling from and misrepresenting) I'd sexualize the second I see even a glimpse of her being open to it, even if she is younger, but no way I'm leading with that.
So you agree with the particular nuance (combining locations if you're gonna do high-volume), but WHEN I SAY it, well it's "you're only saying it because you're the social circle guy".
Last edited:
