Looks like my game journey has been a top-down approach. When I started off, for a brief period I was doing indirect game inadvertently (not having enough balls to go direct?!) which gave me good results.
However, a wing I used to hangout at the time challenged me to go direct and just to prove him I can do that, I veered off to direct game and started getting great reactions. Hadn't realised results over reactions back then. In hindsight, it was a mistake.
Btw since the place where I live in gets dark too early (around 4 PM) these days, I've more or less stopped doing street approaches and only meet chics indoors like cafes, grocery stores etc. Since it's not very convenient to go direct in these venues, I've been going indirect and they're working great (except that I'm not successfully able to follow through all the way until the end, since there is a dissonance in my frame with the approach and seduction). Perhaps I need to unlearn direct game and I guess it takes sometime. Indirect also seems very gratifying since it comes across very smooth and sophisticated.
Anyway back to the question: I've always been an opponent of IOIs since I've been with a few chics who didn't give me any IOI (or did they??) and would've missed them if I was reliant on IOIs. But recently when I was walking down the street with a friend he pointed out twice that chics were checking me out and I was totally oblivious to it. Also, this post from @Chase came just at the right time:
Thread 'Sexually inexperienced men need time and exposure to receptive women to learn to sense and respond to receptive women's signals'
https://www.skilledseducer.com/threads/sexually-inexperienced-men-need-time-and-exposure-to-receptive-women-to-learn-to-sense-and-respond-to-receptive-womens-signals.27667
So, I guess I was missing signals all along and could've made it more efficient by looking for them. Although I look for signs and calibrate during all other stages of seduction like moving her/escalation/bouncing/kissing/fractionating/sex etc but doing this during approaching would make my arsenal potent and might be a game-changer. I went through a few articles on GC and they were all targeted either for later stages of seduction or in indoor venues but nothing related to street approach.
Given that it gets dark quite early, it'd be prudent to approach chics on the street who express IOIs. A couple of them that I noticed today glanced at me for a micro-second but since I was in a rush, I didn't approach them.
BTW, on the street I'd of course still go direct but I can open with a chase-frame or more semi-direct. For the ones who gave IOIs today morning, I thought I could've opened with one of these:
"There was a moment between us, wanted to meet you" or
"I saw you checking me out and thought it'd be impolite to not introduce" or
"there was something about you that I can't put a finger on, thought I'll come find out" or
"it was a serendipitous moment. Hi, I'm gladiator" or
"you have predatory eyes (said with a teasing tone)" or
Just "Hi".
(Let me know if you have any other better openers, possibly indirect. I'll tailor and calibrate them)
Is that the only sign you guys look for or are there any other signs that you notice in Street game? Also when they glance at me very very briefly, it's hard to discern if it was really an IOI or she was a free-spirited person just being social and welcoming to strangers. Is that what you still consider as an IOI?
However, a wing I used to hangout at the time challenged me to go direct and just to prove him I can do that, I veered off to direct game and started getting great reactions. Hadn't realised results over reactions back then. In hindsight, it was a mistake.
Btw since the place where I live in gets dark too early (around 4 PM) these days, I've more or less stopped doing street approaches and only meet chics indoors like cafes, grocery stores etc. Since it's not very convenient to go direct in these venues, I've been going indirect and they're working great (except that I'm not successfully able to follow through all the way until the end, since there is a dissonance in my frame with the approach and seduction). Perhaps I need to unlearn direct game and I guess it takes sometime. Indirect also seems very gratifying since it comes across very smooth and sophisticated.
Anyway back to the question: I've always been an opponent of IOIs since I've been with a few chics who didn't give me any IOI (or did they??) and would've missed them if I was reliant on IOIs. But recently when I was walking down the street with a friend he pointed out twice that chics were checking me out and I was totally oblivious to it. Also, this post from @Chase came just at the right time:
Thread 'Sexually inexperienced men need time and exposure to receptive women to learn to sense and respond to receptive women's signals'
https://www.skilledseducer.com/threads/sexually-inexperienced-men-need-time-and-exposure-to-receptive-women-to-learn-to-sense-and-respond-to-receptive-womens-signals.27667
So, I guess I was missing signals all along and could've made it more efficient by looking for them. Although I look for signs and calibrate during all other stages of seduction like moving her/escalation/bouncing/kissing/fractionating/sex etc but doing this during approaching would make my arsenal potent and might be a game-changer. I went through a few articles on GC and they were all targeted either for later stages of seduction or in indoor venues but nothing related to street approach.
Given that it gets dark quite early, it'd be prudent to approach chics on the street who express IOIs. A couple of them that I noticed today glanced at me for a micro-second but since I was in a rush, I didn't approach them.
BTW, on the street I'd of course still go direct but I can open with a chase-frame or more semi-direct. For the ones who gave IOIs today morning, I thought I could've opened with one of these:
"There was a moment between us, wanted to meet you" or
"I saw you checking me out and thought it'd be impolite to not introduce" or
"there was something about you that I can't put a finger on, thought I'll come find out" or
"it was a serendipitous moment. Hi, I'm gladiator" or
"you have predatory eyes (said with a teasing tone)" or
Just "Hi".
(Let me know if you have any other better openers, possibly indirect. I'll tailor and calibrate them)
Is that the only sign you guys look for or are there any other signs that you notice in Street game? Also when they glance at me very very briefly, it's hard to discern if it was really an IOI or she was a free-spirited person just being social and welcoming to strangers. Is that what you still consider as an IOI?
Last edited: