You're (maybe) unconsciously misinterpreting everything you're reading, either because you have blinders on or you're deeply emotionally invested in this topic.Somebody posted this, if I’m not mistaken it was Skills: https://www.theskillsmethod.com/the-2-types-of-men-when-it-comes-to-seduction/
This is also incorrect and outdated, it’s only partially true. It somehow presumes that provider is a guy who doesn’t like sex or is bad, asexual. Don’t believe that, there are guys who are bad but there are also great guys in relationships who provide great sex. Think about it: classical provider may wait little bit, couple weeks or months, but then he gets laid multiple times a week for months or years. This provider has more sexual encounters with one woman in one year than lover does all together with bunch of women, and virtually without any effort (other than initial waiting). Read it one more time, good provider has an access to sex easily 365 times a year without any effort. So much sex he is tired of it. Top lover can’t beat that. The woman develops way deeper connection with provider over time than she can ever have with lover.
Madonna/whore is in my opinion becoming ridiculous concept, it’s just a black and white thinking, reality is different. Of course women love sex, but they can‘t sleep with everybody either. They can’t be easy with guys they like because that decreases their value. This concept was maybe true some 20 years ago when there wasn‘t much information about relationships and dating available. It somehow assumes that woman is either pure virgin Madonna or cheap whore. Madonnas with low count are of course better fitted for relationship, I don’t know any guy who would want LTR or marry a whore. Nobody wants cheap woman for LTR who sleeps with a guy the first day either. Just think about it, do you want LTR with woman who sleeps with you right away? I would be very hesitant. What makes you think she didn’t sleep with dozens of other guys already? What makes you think she won’t be cheating on you behind you back If she is so easy?
Hence traditional women who don’t sleep around have high value, they are not pure Madonnas but they don’t necessary sleep around with bunch of guys either. They are simply using sex as leverage, as negotiation to get what they want. If you were woman you’d be doing exactly the same. And if you as a provider can also negotiate well, you have access to sex 365 days a year.
For example:
Where are you getting these ideas? Nobody who posts about the Madonna/whore complex is advocating for it... And why do you assume that a "lover" can't lay the same girl repeatedly? And you can't just assume the "provider" relationship is gonna last for months or years, it could fall apart in days or weeks.
and go bang some 5-6. Not interested in 5-6, thank you though.
Wick didn't tell you to do that, you're just assuming this to be the case to preserve your idea of "my way = quality, any other way = 5-6".
You're assuming the best case of your own "side" while assuming the absolute worst case of the other "side".
Problem is, this isn't a sports match, there's nothing to attack or defend.
You need to figure out why you're so emotionally invested in this subject, and why you're so vehement in your idea before anything can get through to you.