This however sounds quite different from 60 who isn't trying to raise buying temperature fast.
His game sounds more slow burn and with less fancy footwork.
60: "I want to be able to get a chick to lick my bum in a bathroom after 10 minutes.
I will say no more
feel like as the game evolved we kind of got swept up in the wave of 2nd gen verbals that we lost some recipes around physical game/ sexual tension.
Don't get me wrong I think sex talk and your gambits are revolutionary and I've used them a lot to set the right frames.
However talking/ having a high verbal IQ doesn't come naturally to me - building tension and seductive listening does... hence me being drawn to 60, ijjjji, Cosy etc.
Yeah well, no offense taken.
I personally love their style of game, and in periods I love playing around with it. I think it is a totally legit way of doing things and I wouldn't mind people discussing it again.
I guess the reason behind sexual "verbal" take-over from that crowd was accidental, namely that I was younger and most likely to stick around, compared to them.
Sometimes, things are just accidental.
Was style of game does not exclude another.
Would love to hear more abou these dudes... maybe apart from Sleazy who I figured was more focused on picking targets & raising BT
Can't remember the stuff they wrote 10+ years ago. So sorry... I simply can't remember old quality posters. Maybe
@Chase can enlighten you. You know, after almost 15 years on forums, you simply can't remember everything you read.
Also if 60 was against fancy verbals in exception to your sextalk what was his consistency like compared to yours?
I think there is most nuance here. He wasn't against "fancy verbals". He was against the whole "clowney" approach to game that was populare during that era. Because being a dancing monkey would kill all the tension.
Also, no talking at all will almost always generate more sexual tension than talking. Which is good. The problem is... not every situation, will allow you to do exactly that. Hence some screening is required.
Like everything... pros and cons.
He seemed to pre empt things like ASD, resistance while also communicating discretionary frames by creating Its On Moments i.e mutual escalation physically.
Isnt this the exact thing thay your sex talk strives to do?
Can we switch sex talk with IOM/micro escalations to get the same result
Sure an IOM will reduce some ASD, but it will mostly qualify her while establishing comfort.
ASD busters are aimed at busting... ASD.
Some ASD may be reduced through qualification (such as IOMs), but his main tool against ASD was.... isolation and discret isolation (like most physical gamers).
-Teevster