@The Emerald Archer,
Missed this earlier:
I am curious though, I thought "cool" and "high-status" were relative terms. Is that not true? Or are you going off of what the mainstream thinks is high-status and cool like high-end clubbing, VIP tables, Instagram selfies and snapchats showing off how "cool" of a life you live, throwing money around, etc.?
They're relative terms, yeah.
(all terms are relative, if you want to be philosophical about it

)
I am using them the way Oh Pry uses them.
Which is the way the mainstream uses them.
He wants to live the ideal TV trope mainstream lifestyle, like what you see in Hollywood.
So that's what I am speaking to... more or less.
It seems like the types of circles you mention here are party circles with all the glitz and glamor and posting snapchats and Instagram selfies out at the club. That may be the definition of "cool" to some folks, but then there are others who may view people who like to do drugs, binge-drink and jockey for status and attention as shallow, or even people with problems in their life that they're trying to escape/can't deal with responsibly.
Yeah, exactly.
This stuff often seems glamorous and ultra cool when you are the outsider looking in.
Then once you have been an insider for a bit, you realize it is hollow, a bunch of conformist people trying to be like what they saw on TV.
It is why 2Pac calls them "phonies in the club" and why other high level rappers call them poseurs. Meanwhile, the lower level rappers (who have not made it into the upper echelons) are all about aspiring to that club lifestyle.
I know for me when I think of high-status or "cool" I think of entrepreneurs who are financially independent or someone who is living life on their own terms and has a lot of freedom to travel and experience cool new things in life such as digital nomad or freelancer.
What do you think about this?
Oh yeah, for sure.
My own personal definition of cool does not really include a 9-to-5 dude who hangs out with the cool kids at the club on the weekend blowing through his IB paycheck on bottle service and Instagram divas.
I know exactly what that guy's life is like and the trajectory he is on and where he will be in 20 years. And it is pretty boring and uncool.
At the same time, I realize people who have not had much exposure to those circles will tend to pedestalize people living that lifestyle.
Free thinking digital nomads and entrepreneurs who have lived in multiple countries and are totally unplugged from any single matrix and able to discuss things to a deeper and more insightful level that most people don't realize exist / can't properly process if you try to discuss it with them are the cool people in my book.
But, in this thread, I am using the best language available to me to discuss a given paradigm of 'cool'.
A lot of what I do with GC is having to discuss guys' specific perspectives and situations, that maybe don't fully overlap with my own.
And in general I do not go super deep into my own opinions or predilections too much -- you know the old "opinions are like assholes" saying.
The site is "girls chase / skilled seducer", rather than "Chase's personal opinion page"
@Rain,
Sometimes variables can be annoying! So the more game/fundamentals you get, the more you may become someones type, or close enough, along with occasionally being someones type by default, as in the example you gave.
So its probably hard for you to put a percentage number on it? Because, it depends on them and on their mood?
You are often not going to know exactly whom or what a girl really is until you have known her a few months and had a lot of good conversations with her and observed her behavior in a variety of conditions. And she has revealed some of her unexpected secrets.
The only thing that happens over time is you realize how often you are not totally 100% on point with your initial guesses about women, as you spend more time getting to know more of the women you bed and keep around.
Also, behavior will change in different moods.
I have known girls who were usually super flirty and open who met a guy during a down mood, and the guy thought the girl was some reserved chick he somehow opened up, when in fact "opened up" was her default.
And I have had girls I got together with in some rare instance when they were pretty open, and discovered that normally they are quite reserved, won't talk to strangers at all, etc.
I think the natural inclination for most guys is to assume that a girl is like however she was when you met her.
Sometimes that is true... a lot of times it isn't.
Goes both ways, too. I have had girlfriends tell me I am way more charming in public than I am at a home. I am still attractive at home, but I am... gruff, and distracted, and not always as attentive or captivating.
But in public with an audience I turn into Charisma Man and everyone is captivated and the girl herself finds me entrancing.
I did not realize I did that until I had girls point it out to me.
Would the more open-to-experiences girls and more curious girls , despite being easier to meet via cold approach, be more likely to cheat due to their more novelty seeking nature, by default?
So you'd be better off actually finding one thats a bit more closed off.... but still open because you're her type and/or you're became closer to her type with game/fundamentals. Or she happened to be more open to cold approach on that day.
It depends.
Openness to experience / curiosity is one factor that can increase a woman's likelihood to cheat.
But there are other factors. How emotionally changeable she is. How impulsive she is. How duty-bound she is (i.e., is she the type of girl who will feel an obligation to care for an ailing parent, or is she more likely to want to stick that parent in a rest home?). How petty and vengeful she is. How high her sex drive is. What her socio-sexuality is (i.e., how slutty vs. how prudish she is). What specifically she thinks of her relationship with you (is this going somewhere? Or is this probably not going anywhere? Or did it use to be good but is headed for a cliff?). Etc.
I really struggle to deal with closed minded people personally, because I am a person who is just interested in everything and willing to consider any possibility. So too much closed mindedness in a person I have to regularly deal with is torture.
So for me, personally, I will go for girls who are reasonably open to new experience, but not total thrill seekers, and just screen for other qualities that make them less likely to stray (like not being sociosexually unrestricted, not being someone who shirks obligations, not being vengeful/petty, etc.).
But how do you tell, if she accepted your approach, was it due to you being close enough to her type and she would normally closed off vs she is part of that "certain type of woman very open to cold approach"?
Only way for sure is with time as you get to know her.
There is no good way I know of to quickly and easily differentiate between generally open girls who accepted you because they are generally open vs. girls who are not generally open but were open to you because you were their type, the mood was right, etc.
(even at the poles, it can be deceptive -- I have met girls who came across as distant and reserved on approach, then as I got to know them I discovered they met a LOT of men. These girls are always the most confusing...
how does this girl meet so many men being as closed off and unemotional as she is? Do a lot of guys like that? There is also the odd girl here and there who seems super bubbly and open but claims to barely ever meet men. I don't like bubbly girls enough to date them and stick around long enough to verify whether that is true or just something she is saying to seem more relationship-worthy, but you'd assume if there are closed-seeming girls who are actually open, there are probably a few open-seeming girls who are actually closed. Anyway, the whole thing is a head trip once you start digging into it)
@Oh Pry,
I'm not punching on Indians.
I am talking about a specific observation I have personally had over the years. Across a broad swath of anecdotes.
The most annoyingly hierarchy-obsessed professor I have had was the one Indian professor I had. Every Indian guy I have rolled with in the field has done little annoying status-y things around me with other people. I have had white guys and a black guy do that too, but not all of them... it is a small minority of them. With Indian guys, it has been every one.
Sometimes I will meet an Indian guy who seems cool and say "Finally! One free from the status games!" and then he will start status jockeying me.
And I am so disappoint.
Anyway.
The thing with Greek life -- okay sure, that was the trigger.
There are a lot of guys with a lot of exposure to Greek life, including myself and almost everyone on this forum, that are not affected this way.
So obviously this woke a specific thing up in you, specifically, and affected you in a way different from a lot of people.
I have not spend a ton of time in the South, so can't speak to that. Maybe that is the case.
In some US cities, you are not getting the most genetically beautiful women or hot girls unless you have social connections and status.
Maybe.
I have yet to see a city like this though.
IME, most socialite women are not top tier in terms of genetic looks.
However, they are VERY good at doing makeup, fashion, some (or a lot of) plastic surgery, etc.
And you know -- this is also a kind of genetic sexual selection.
Rather than selecting for beauty at the DNA level (which I personally value more highly), you are selecting for the drive to beautify oneself using all available means and climb the social hierarchy (which is a specific personality trait, and actually the one people are advertising when they engage in these pursuits. And more and more over time I am becoming convinced that the lion's share of personality traits are strongly genetic. So there actually does seem to be some genetic sexual selection going on here, with status seekers seeking other successful status seeker mates to produce offspring who are excellent at status seeking themselves. And there are for sure eco-sociological niches for status seeking individuals. But... I digress...).
The male friendships I have are genuine with cool guys who have same interests as me.
What are those interests?
Because you do not need so much game to meet these guys.
Do things where those interested are involved, show that you are skilled at the thing and have interesting things to say about that, and be a cool enough guy (who does not annoy people with any status jockeying or victim mentality!), and likeminded men will want to be around you.
Long-term, I don't want to rely on cold approach. I want to build a lifestyle that gets hot women in my life, puts me in touch with guys who have access to hot women and introduce me to them, and similarly puts me in a situation where I can introduce guys to hot women too if I want (these being guys I genuinely like even if they are not stereotypically cool).
And that is a fine goal. Nothing wrong with it.
Main thing I weighed in to say here, in this thread, was that this is not "next level" -- compared to what the focus is of the site.
That said -- I can certainly understand it is next level
for you.
Because it is what you want to do, and it is what you want to do more than cold approach.
Sure, months ago for me it was all "be high status or be at top of pyramid".
Now it has changed to:
Okay. Any movement away from that is interesting and a good evolution.
1. I just want hot girls (good looking women regardless of status).
Cool. Easiest way on Earth to find them is day game, plus training yourself to recognize physical, genetic beauty, and not be distracted by a.) makeup, b.) hair, c.) clothes, d.) skin on display.
This takes some training, but will let you find some real diamonds who are not in flashy mode, and thus not getting hit on and fending off approaches, thus are not bitchy, thus as way more open to meeting people.
Sometimes these turn out to actually be flashy hot girls who just didn't wear their makeup out that day. And you get a "steal" (if what you actually want is a flashy hot girl, who is also actually a genuinely beautiful girl who is then flashy hot on top of that).
Sometimes they are girls who don't care as much about makeup or clothes. Then you need to make a judgment call on how important that is to you.
I've had the experience of bedding girls who are beautiful and flashy when I met them, but actually aren't normally flashy and were just going through a brief flashy phase, then became non-flashy once dating. Which is a bit of a let down, but not huge, since I'm not hyper-focused on the girl always having to look flashy, and really what I care most about is "How good does this girl look butt naked?" And if her genes are good, and she takes reasonable care of herself, you are going to be pretty happy with that.
Anyway, that is me. Maybe that is useful to you or other guys (or maybe not?).
2. I want socially adjusted guy friends who love partying and also gaming women (regardless of their social standing).
In that case you should not be trying to get them by throwing women at them.
Especially if you are doing mostly dating apps, and these are guys who love gaming -- they are probably going to be better at cold approach than you are.
Instead, I would be going out, chatting up cool guys, being a cool guy myself, and talking to women around him. If he sees that you can talk to women without being retarded, unless he is a weirdo he will generally want to keep in touch. This is something I have found to be true across the board in every city across the world -- cool guys like other cool guys who are cool with them and also cool with women. It is somewhat hard for most guys to find other guys who are not completely retarded around women, so just being able to talk to a woman in a chill way and get her flirting even a little bit is usually all you need.
3. I want to be able to create a life long-term where I meet hot women due to my lifestyle and have friends/connections that are introducing me to hot girls.
4. I want to be able to do the same for number 2.
This is doable.
It is, however, a lot of work.
The biggest aspect of the work is group maintenance over time. Because people are going to leave your group over time. And eventually most groups collapse. The venues you go to close. The people all leave. Stuff that used to be cool and a group could cohere around stops being cool and no one wants to do it anymore.
Grab the charisma/lifestyle product when I have that out. There is an entire 30 or 40 minute lesson on exactly this (this is Lesson 4 of the Lifestyle section... the title is "Maintaining Lifestyles Long-Term").
5. I want to be able to grow my social life to where parties have hot girls and guy friends I care about in them, some of whom might be able to bring hot girls too.
Do I care about being "cool" as much? Not really. I mean I now have set my standard for what I think is cool even if others judge. I have hot girls in my life and friends I genuinely get along with, are on my wavelength, and that is that. So what if they are not high status by society standards, if they party and have their lives together, that's all I really care of.
I'll get more into this but I think RSD's Luke and latest RSD content really touches on this and why cold approach is not the best tool even though it helps.
Sure, that is cool.
There is a lot you can do to pull it off.
There are different personality types in the world, too.
Some guys genuinely want a lot of friendly social interaction, with the occasional lay from that, but really the most important thing for them is having this circle of friends to hang out with.
Pickup is generally more of a loner's game. It is a lot more efficient and gives you much better choice than social circle, but if you specifically need that kind of hanging out and shooting the breeze with people (and really, I think more people need / want that than not), then building your crew is quite possibly the way to go.
But -- please -- none of this "this place needs to level up and get on the next level with the social circle bandwagon" stuff.
It is cool if you like to hang out with your bros and hit on the chicks that come over. That is cool. Nobody is knocking it.
It is not however "next level" to being able to go out anytime, any place, and pick out a girl who is exactly what you are looking for, and know how to go take your shot with her, and go in without being afraid of rejection, and getting her contact info, and setting up the date with her, and putting your Johnston in her, then turning her into an FWB or girlfriend or open relationship or wife.
As other guys in this thread have said, the site is "Skilled Seducer" not "Skilled Socializer" -- while socializing is a part of what we do here, the
focus is on putting men and women together.
(there are always a million directions guys want this website to grow in. I have had many men tell me it is time for us to focus more on politics, it is time for us to focus more on serious relationships and marriage, it is time for us to focus more on fitness and getting ripped, it is time for us to focus more on spirituality and philosophy, it is time for us to focus more on many things. While these things are interesting to me as well, you can imagine what would happen to this website if it started to be about everything. It would stop being about what it is about. As interested as I am in a wide range of topics, it is crucial to this site's mission that it keep its focus on helping guys better meet and bed women... and getting girls chasing you)
Chase